Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,  Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zlib: properly clamp to uLong
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 10:03:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqzf0rrdbp.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.2153.git.1781790619424.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget's message of "Thu, 18 Jun 2026 13:50:18 +0000")

The original in js/objects-larger-than-4gb-on-windows says things
like:

+	s->z.total_in = (uLong)(s->total_in & ULONG_MAX_VALUE);
+	s->z.total_out = (uLong)(s->total_out & ULONG_MAX_VALUE);

Your patch ...

> +static inline uLong zlib_uLong_cap(size_t s)
> +{
> +	return s < ULONG_MAX_VALUE ? (uLong)s : ULONG_MAX_VALUE;
> +}
> +
>  static void zlib_pre_call(git_zstream *s)
>  {
>  	s->z.next_in = s->next_in;
>  	s->z.next_out = s->next_out;
> -	s->z.total_in = (uLong)(s->total_in & ULONG_MAX_VALUE);
> -	s->z.total_out = (uLong)(s->total_out & ULONG_MAX_VALUE);
> +	s->z.total_in = zlib_uLong_cap(s->total_in);
> +	s->z.total_out = zlib_uLong_cap(s->total_out);

... is an obvious fix for that.

> @@ -60,7 +65,7 @@ static void zlib_post_call(git_zstream *s, int status)
>  	 * We track our own totals and verify only the low bits match.
>  	 */
>  	if ((s->z.total_out & ULONG_MAX_VALUE) !=
> -	    ((s->total_out + bytes_produced) & ULONG_MAX_VALUE))
> +	    ((zlib_uLong_cap(s->total_out) + bytes_produced) & ULONG_MAX_VALUE))
>  		BUG("total_out mismatch");

Because we now clamp (not "taking lower bits of") s->total_out to a
value between 0..4GB and store it in s->z.total_out in pre-call, let
zlib do its thing that increments s->z.total_out modulo 4GB, and we
clamp the s->total_out (before incrementing) the same way in
post_call here, both sides of "!=" above even out.  But the comment
before this comparison that claims that "we ... verify only the low
bits match" is a bit off the reality, I suspect.

> @@ -68,7 +73,7 @@ static void zlib_post_call(git_zstream *s, int status)
>  	 */
>  	if (status != Z_NEED_DICT &&
>  	    (s->z.total_in & ULONG_MAX_VALUE) !=
> -	    ((s->total_in + bytes_consumed) & ULONG_MAX_VALUE))
> +	    ((zlib_uLong_cap(s->total_in) + bytes_consumed) & ULONG_MAX_VALUE))
>  		BUG("total_in mismatch");
>  
>  	s->total_out += bytes_produced;
>
> base-commit: 7a094d68a27e321a99c8ab6b700909e503904bd9

      reply	other threads:[~2026-06-18 17:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-18 13:50 [PATCH] zlib: properly clamp to uLong Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2026-06-18 17:03 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqzf0rrdbp.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox