From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Joerg Thalheim <joerg@thalheim.io>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] config: retry acquiring config.lock for 100ms
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2026 10:53:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqzf3klym1.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260403100135.3901610-1-joerg@thalheim.io> (Joerg Thalheim's message of "Fri, 3 Apr 2026 12:01:35 +0200")
Joerg Thalheim <joerg@thalheim.io> writes:
> From: Jörg Thalheim <joerg@thalheim.io>
>
> When multiple processes write to a config file concurrently, they
> contend on its ".lock" file, which is acquired via open(O_EXCL) with
> no retry. The losers fail immediately with "could not lock config
> file". Two processes writing unrelated keys (say, "branch.a.remote"
> and "branch.b.remote") have no semantic conflict, yet one of them
> fails for a purely mechanical reason.
>
> This bites in practice when running `git worktree add -b` concurrently
> against the same repository. Each invocation makes several writes to
> ".git/config" to set up branch tracking, and tooling that creates
> worktrees in parallel sees intermittent failures. Worse, `git worktree
> add` does not propagate the failed config write to its exit code: the
> worktree is created and the command exits 0, but tracking
> configuration is silently dropped.
>
> The lock is held only for the duration of rewriting a small file, so
> retrying for 100 ms papers over any realistic contention while still
> failing fast if a stale lock has been left behind by a crashed
> process. This mirrors what we already do for individual reference
> locks (4ff0f01cb7 (refs: retry acquiring reference locks for 100ms,
> 2017-08-21)).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jörg Thalheim <joerg@thalheim.io>
> ---
> config.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
OK. This is consistent with the default used for a ref update with
files backend. Various subsystems use their own value randomly
chosen out of thin air, it seems. credential-store uses 1000ms, gc
uses 150ms to interact with launchctl, refs have their own per
backend, etc.
> diff --git a/config.c b/config.c
> index 156f2a24fa..f7aff8725d 100644
> --- a/config.c
> +++ b/config.c
> @@ -2903,6 +2903,14 @@ char *git_config_prepare_comment_string(const char *comment)
> return prepared;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * How long to retry acquiring config.lock when another process holds it.
> + * The lock is held only for the duration of rewriting a small file, so
> + * 100 ms covers any realistic contention while still failing fast if
> + * a stale lock has been left behind by a crashed process.
> + */
> +#define CONFIG_LOCK_TIMEOUT_MS 100
> +
Making this configurable would make a cute chicken-and-egg problem?
;-) No, no need for that---just kidding.
Will queue. Thanks.
> @@ -2986,7 +2994,8 @@ int repo_config_set_multivar_in_file_gently(struct repository *r,
> * The lock serves a purpose in addition to locking: the new
> * contents of .git/config will be written into it.
> */
> - fd = hold_lock_file_for_update(&lock, config_filename, 0);
> + fd = hold_lock_file_for_update_timeout(&lock, config_filename, 0,
> + CONFIG_LOCK_TIMEOUT_MS);
> if (fd < 0) {
> error_errno(_("could not lock config file %s"), config_filename);
> ret = CONFIG_NO_LOCK;
> @@ -3331,7 +3340,8 @@ static int repo_config_copy_or_rename_section_in_file(
> if (!config_filename)
> config_filename = filename_buf = repo_git_path(r, "config");
>
> - out_fd = hold_lock_file_for_update(&lock, config_filename, 0);
> + out_fd = hold_lock_file_for_update_timeout(&lock, config_filename, 0,
> + CONFIG_LOCK_TIMEOUT_MS);
> if (out_fd < 0) {
> ret = error(_("could not lock config file %s"), config_filename);
> goto out;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-03 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-03 10:01 [PATCH] config: retry acquiring config.lock for 100ms Joerg Thalheim
2026-04-03 17:53 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-04-08 10:34 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-05-11 2:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-05-11 7:33 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-05-11 9:06 ` Jörg Thalheim
2026-05-11 10:01 ` Patrick Steinhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqzf3klym1.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=joerg@thalheim.io \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox