From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-b5-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-b5-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FE7123A58F for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2025 18:11:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.156 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764526271; cv=none; b=Jd66STucd526ccRcSDSjDAM4gSr0IlbeVip3VsR8km3MWxz6X6FnIGgSK8+I3Y8egbhuz8QiKvoTEXf6QFB3u+8WtZsGXDYNNY87l18J4xU0TN+NFa2IkT2554Wa+Pb652tATFPZjbD/OEu3FGBgl61lmx/BrsOfmd8gzKMLOa0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764526271; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3DLEiIdXB604i5LH51531txh4TBBFh3FWDe/nduxvS8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=UiYI4Xtwbd57LekkfrzEzZXpB8uyKOzSggvQjzaHy8IWKxbrbpigatd1EDYinxl2aSrqnIv6gHxxJMo5klRHWTAF2rTN/wqgw1nd5fqkLzSkDBK3oa4u3OS0DKJ0XZA/t9aJy0kqsr8KmxMi4TWgfpE9kshvws5NDcOYpgO2CRw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=ZLjsDGvb; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=O0SjputL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.156 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="ZLjsDGvb"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="O0SjputL" Received: from phl-compute-05.internal (phl-compute-05.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfhigh.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40E077A007D; Sun, 30 Nov 2025 13:11:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-frontend-01 ([10.202.2.160]) by phl-compute-05.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 30 Nov 2025 13:11:08 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1764526268; x=1764612668; bh=JxIiFXI2YS xncb1/4hjlYE/1ds42J0Dd3mbXAcNkz4A=; b=ZLjsDGvbmtbRq0RubmVVacjX1I S0y1SHX8Gm8Ew+SV1NMsn7iBHyjYzd5geJfuAN/kb0wWMt/wotN+S2aCQmaXKpma DOCwF3/HLvMwokggB/sdRuxgtsOuWm+I6dKttvvL34K0mL5R7YVO0NLCi6lzRK7D WKQ3RpYkVqprWU2Q4L2jAVPtjGrZ5IYpV6Vyr+KDaJh4UKpblw0mZkirtHEyolsJ IDoVaVsZgqEvx27joTXoZNJU3k3kwEWa0hbvNowZJFp53tZ2LvZV8VDUUIdr7hZP 34mHvoENvKXgdABRGbVo1JPvNeM2tWG19gdWeE++A5qzG69uo4Vnp7y4bn3Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1764526268; x=1764612668; bh=JxIiFXI2YSxncb1/4hjlYE/1ds42J0Dd3mb XAcNkz4A=; b=O0SjputLpGHuZDmUIysofKpK4H5KzqSZm6dU4Kbr2I9gCM29EXr kU+tq755ybjufDyGMGnYx29XTKyJ1+APIjurXYf4JqTAKTkDBltCX9ITQxDIWGP9 2qtdVaHxMdWO7Ul+IJrcVl3qQzH0j61ACD2DQre+K/q2itpo8Pbw3xeyCAr3ncaJ pC25YBao/xQ7f/SvZeS0oBDIWlGFzXG4LmNXAfEsoZJ3JoN9zB69jM51u1RXgmBS fVEXh6FNPJS/v9U9ltadEMESb2ZM8+eYwOqnrLPmnzDNOLKX04ajyktlq/Wj7Mt2 Q+Fyl5Qi4w/SODYm38hEoq5FMGd0GuAq05Q== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtdeggddvheehhedvucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujf gurhephffvvefujghfkgffkfgfgggtsehttdertddtredtnecuhfhrohhmpefluhhnihho ucevucfjrghmrghnohcuoehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpefhieeflefgfeeuudejleegtdfhieeivdffteevfeeivdevhffghefhhedt hfejvdenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivg eptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtgho mhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepiedpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtohepph gvfhhfsehpvghffhdrnhgvthdprhgtphhtthhopegsvghnrdhknhhosghlvgesghhmrghi lhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehrrghnrdgrrhhighhurhdoghhithesshgrmhhsrghrrg drtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghp thhtoheprhgrrgdrlhhkmhhlsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithhsth gvrhesphhosghogidrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 30 Nov 2025 13:11:07 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: "D. Ben Knoble" , Ran Ari-Gur , git@vger.kernel.org, "raa.lkml@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [BUG] `git clone '-c KEY=VALUE'` no longer works In-Reply-To: <20251130134930.GB199421@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Sun, 30 Nov 2025 08:49:30 -0500") References: <20251124235530.GC2051672@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20251126150215.GB4143292@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20251130134930.GB199421@coredump.intra.peff.net> Importance: high Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2025 10:11:06 -0800 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Jeff King writes: > That's about where I'm at, though I'm a little worried by Dscho's > mention that apparently git-lfs has the same problem. So maybe it's more > widespread than I am giving it credit for? Reading , I think the mention of LFS in Dscho's message on this list was a red-herring, as corrected by Dscho himself at https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/issues/5972#issuecomment-3577520017 I do not know if buggily constructed command line by Atlassian Bamboo is something we want to bend over backwards to help papering over, but probably not. > I dunno. I certainly do not want to get into a deprecation period and > all of that mess. Maybe the breakage in v2.52.0 would be enough for > callers to notice and fix their invocations, and we could just quietly > remove the hack later? But then, I am not sure what makes "later" any > better than "now". Yes. Let's write it off as an inadvertent bugfix ;-) Thanks.