Re: [PATCH v2] doc: patch-id: fix accidental literal blocks

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com writes:

> From: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
>
> All the final paragraphs on these three options are rendered as
> literal blocks. The intent was surely to keep each of them wed to their
> respective description list items. But the attempt at maintaining the
> indentation level of the block causes each them to be interpreted as a
> code block, since code blocks can be represented using indentation.
>
> We need to use list continuation (+) in order to keep them wed to
> their blocks.
>
> There is also an unordered list which sandwiches two paragraphs on an
> option. We don’t need to do anything about that since it attaches to the
> description list item without list continuation (i.e. it is already
> correct). But for consistency let’s use list continuation and an open
> block on it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
> ---

Thanks.  Let me mark this for 'next'.