From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: M Hickford <mirth.hickford@gmail.com>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Suggestion: error "tag ... already exists" should distinguish between tagging different or same commit:
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 07:51:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqzfefodje.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGJzqskj803dUcEuV+P-yuWdT0tiaidb7h3YxQSCgYHWgBfaWA@mail.gmail.com> (M. Hickford's message of "Tue, 10 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0100")
M Hickford <mirth.hickford@gmail.com> writes:
>> Besides, in the above examples, is d4e6038a something the user
>> immediately recognises as the same as v1.9.5 or the object existing
>> v1.9.5 tag points at? I somehow doubt it. So after getting the
>> error, there needs some digging to figure out how v1.9.5 and
>> existing hello are related to each other _anyway_, I would think.
>
> Good point. How about just changing the second error message?
>
>>git tag hello v1.9.5
>
>>git tag hello v1.9.5
> fatal: tag 'hello' already exists
>
>>git tag hello v2.0.0
> fatal: tag 'hello' already exists but points at a different commit
Or simply something like this. I am not convinced (yet) that this
is a good idea; I merely is showing that the implementation would
look like this.
----- >8 -----
Subject: tag: allow idempotent "git tag" without "--force"
When "git tag T O" is told to create a tag pointing at an object O
without the "--force" option, it refuses with "tag T already exists",
even when T points at O (which makes it a no-op).
Let's allow this "idempotent" case by special casing.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
---
builtin/tag.c | 2 +-
t/t7004-tag.sh | 12 +++++++++---
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git c/builtin/tag.c w/builtin/tag.c
index 4742b27d16..5380a46494 100644
--- c/builtin/tag.c
+++ w/builtin/tag.c
@@ -660,7 +660,7 @@ int cmd_tag(int argc,
if (refs_read_ref(get_main_ref_store(the_repository), ref.buf, &prev))
oidclr(&prev, the_repository->hash_algo);
- else if (!force)
+ else if (!force && (create_tag_object || !oideq(&object, &prev)))
die(_("tag '%s' already exists"), tag);
opt.message_given = msg.given || msgfile;
diff --git c/t/t7004-tag.sh w/t/t7004-tag.sh
index 10835631ca..9a253a44a8 100755
--- c/t/t7004-tag.sh
+++ w/t/t7004-tag.sh
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ test_expect_success 'annotated tag with --create-reflog has correct message' '
'
test_expect_success '--create-reflog does not create reflog on failure' '
- test_must_fail git tag --create-reflog mytag &&
+ test_must_fail git tag --create-reflog mytag no-such-object &&
test_must_fail git reflog exists refs/tags/mytag
'
@@ -183,8 +183,14 @@ test_expect_success 'listing tags using a non-matching pattern should output not
# special cases for creating tags:
-test_expect_success 'trying to create a tag with the name of one existing should fail' '
- test_must_fail git tag mytag
+test_expect_success 'recreating a tag without --force' '
+ # light-weight tag pointing at the same thing
+ # now succeeds
+ git tag mytag HEAD &&
+ # light-weight tag pointing at a different thing
+ test_must_fail git tag mytag HEAD: &&
+ # creating annotated tag, pointing at the same object.
+ test_must_fail git tag -a -m anno mytag $taggedobject
'
test_expect_success 'trying to create a tag with a non-valid name should fail' '
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-10 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-09 7:00 Suggestion: error "tag ... already exists" should distinguish between tagging different or same commit: M Hickford
2025-06-09 18:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-09 19:37 ` Hilco Wijbenga
2025-06-09 20:15 ` Andreas Schwab
2025-06-09 20:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-09 21:03 ` Hilco Wijbenga
2025-06-10 7:00 ` M Hickford
2025-06-10 14:51 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-07-07 22:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-07-07 23:12 ` rsbecker
2025-07-11 19:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-07-11 19:10 ` [PATCH] tag: allow idempotent "git tag" without "--force" Junio C Hamano
2025-07-11 20:57 ` Justin Tobler
2025-07-11 21:40 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqzfefodje.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mirth.hickford@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).