Re: [PATCH v3 0/6][Outreachy] Introduce os-version Capability with Configurable Options

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com> writes:

> By the way, if we put the OS information in the "agent" capability,
> how do we separate it from the existing "package/version" content and
> make it easy to parse?

Do NOT parse, period.

If three "things" that talk the Git protocol on the other end of the
connection gives "Linux git/2.48.0", and "macOS libgit2/1.9.0", and
"Windows git/2.47.1" as their (enhanced) "agent" strings, there is
no "ah, this one is 1.9.0 which way older than 2.47.1 so it must be
missing features X and Y" the users of the information are allowed
to infer.

Just take it as a single opaque string, and group identical ones.

In the above scenario, we found three different kinds now.  Maybe
we'll accumulate the counts and notice that there are N times as
many connections whose agent string begins with "Windows" as "Linux"
and "macOS" combined or something.  That would be an offline
analysis, and forcing users to do the stats offline would reduce the
temptation to use it for purposes other than its intended one.

You may find "ImNotTellingYou" and may wonder what OS the user is
really using, but they do not want to tell you, so you honor their
wish.

> I don't see a good solution because
> GIT_USER_AGENT could be used, and the config option to not show the OS
> name could be used too.

That is a good privacy measure.

> Also we don't know what could be in the "version" part. The doc says
> that the agent part is typically of the form "package/version" but
> doesn't require it.

Exactly.  I would think it is a feature, and the way to treat the
string in line with the philosophy behind that feature is to take it
as a single opaque thing.