From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-b5-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-b5-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79D6A1F543F for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2025 20:10:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.156 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737490245; cv=none; b=b2cC8G7uFysSsPO7xtkBk4C33RfmI691twN9sIHIuprfw70BkmQ3uhwsG79yyWq626Oz9TOR6MLaRjC86HFuH8n5sHhQ1pzduveQp8zJ6iqVAthkXFkaeqk/oUs3ppZ1ElG0g+HpzJFhiJAcRCTFPuhMaVqFTLErG1eefxt/5tM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737490245; c=relaxed/simple; bh=I8IUQlUPKZlV5fVSwvuevNTIX9Vj5+GwPJZteXj87Do=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ICXrWaIJluI2RFuCwC4XHivY7f+vmFn0KTW+jJe2zTJFT2bYaMOrJx9HXikkH5NZs2d0c2V4xVc6QUOe3A6+9ujCnGa0wH3Rz5T0Q7T8sQEhOdLPcm2NHihH7YYSQL5DT6muo+iTOJUOcTCCce95FW7KtWQGcY+ZYPQHu9zCzDg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=rurM0klA; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=uWowWMWt; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.156 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="rurM0klA"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="uWowWMWt" Received: from phl-compute-11.internal (phl-compute-11.phl.internal [10.202.2.51]) by mailfhigh.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 521A525401D4; Tue, 21 Jan 2025 15:10:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-frontend-02 ([10.202.2.161]) by phl-compute-11.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 21 Jan 2025 15:10:39 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1737490239; x=1737576639; bh=zWOhvCbT27 nouQ+2811RJrylrhab7D7jfomsRD/PUe0=; b=rurM0klAnMJn1Q9ikDRfAAe5YG bd/DqSKeV2Sk7Y8RGRmXnl2WDV/dKJfIkdWMfjfUOHQH8BJ+rxnXWltMmrWjr4qr gVtUGnfseYxGN2p/rvBM921wapouqGVNFd1ox2/B7sMM/gH4G3HFHzZ16yD47r7A wPofJ1dlbVPazua4iMU3Rt+Sfc5U7vzxdN/2zIkkbcu7t747Kk2kwgFUiqKV16PC ZmkPWSuUpLsfs17SQnv41u7LEIoWPwFv6hg3Zm2yiniqgkRKrwBIWiyYibT6Lbob 2qc7wClSMa1BPz1bDJlSPE4+PUGOm3juHLDNgRE+q/jZvott+WcRM5l4EM4Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t= 1737490239; x=1737576639; bh=zWOhvCbT27nouQ+2811RJrylrhab7D7jfom sRD/PUe0=; b=uWowWMWtiLkOVCo+3c00Q9yi6NFgssCc61/aKgjFT5Oo/ex2dJw Q+/1sKSrK+qDhYFrj+N83JYd6yRuJVepyokSymNjef624KcmSZ8jnayS/cnRsSCP JHZ+ejVRclPRvyPDWMgTpsXN6YFYr7CslVCg+nbv+QwGZ71z5X8jBKFKz5AJJoFa 712S+jEBNbYHDcKjGyOvktoZAKz58QltQj+cfaf3PnJq14OvJQ72YbpBad3INTyo 6tsqzRRHBqUqDjuzmluTOcu4BiabFahm7KbRiNUe0I9WVqzBO4zcq34WubqTRuyU WC6gaagTZnOXIBrTY/0I4F0czsqM3Ko98pw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefuddrudejvddguddtfecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdp uffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivg hnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvfevufgjfhffkfgfgggtsehttdfotddtredt necuhfhrohhmpefluhhnihhoucevucfjrghmrghnohcuoehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsoh igrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeikeeufefhtedvffdtgeefkefhffeggfef iedvudegfffgffffveevvdeileffudenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrh grmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhmpdhnsggprhgt phhtthhopeegpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehjphgrlhhushesfh grshhtmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepphhssehpkhhsrdhimhdprhgtphhtthho pehgihhtsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithhsthgvrh esphhosghogidrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 21 Jan 2025 15:10:38 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jan Palus Cc: Patrick Steinhardt , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] t8002-blame: simplify padding generation in blank boundary tests In-Reply-To: (Jan Palus's message of "Mon, 20 Jan 2025 11:47:56 +0100") References: <20250111231107.2190448-1-jpalus@fastmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 12:10:37 -0800 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Jan Palus writes: > Note that original version was "%0.s" in which there is some ambiguity > whether "0" is a flag or field width and not "%.0s" in which "0" indeed > would mean precision. Ah, I missed that part. Also thanks for filling in the "printf from coreutils is the one that has issues with the code". >> Anybody can help that "further polishing as suggested" step, and >> when the patch is left in limbo for too long, I might step in to do >> it myself (when I have no other better things to do), but it is >> customary around here that the original patch submitter does so. > > I was about to follow-up but didn't find time. Sorry it took so long. > I will post v2 shortly. Thanks.