From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (pb-smtp2.pobox.com [64.147.108.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7584617BA4 for ; Sat, 8 Jun 2024 19:06:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.71 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717873591; cv=none; b=hOspC0kcnl+lfaX4UuuFHjwiDFqgnYZoRFcx4AzLqbtaoFcdqHQZTbq2P7lyKKuhv4gJTTPlAy6JoDp90xwFemXorCw4V44gozJXvyLPO8+1RpDE501iGxAFoUlhPjo2NgdqkeEZK7nLmjxXah3N4BhyDEewdBqbgw4ZT+96kFA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717873591; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BWvbvsdnFFMFAZajfWiROiwDMx2zvHmiGljKhgG9NZY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=LJvg94D3TdKTXGl3M0VL469VhbrbG65rnwx2s0Kmoy6K9LknZtaBBP3ajTde9r7P2jo5bp1wf62W94W6xqubAyf8LL+4n+4Ta3iuiC2QlvwSWl1UBD+rWmtBxq4dxwrKovQ2ptSHB2RQ6+crqyrQaCsuc0J1oO9WhhZPKhEP5Wo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=rBe4hmFK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.71 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="rBe4hmFK" Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7941B38F2D; Sat, 8 Jun 2024 15:06:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=BWvbvsdnFFMFAZajfWiROiwDMx2zvHmiGljKhg G9NZY=; b=rBe4hmFKPN8lPDUxntI14L7QwxPutanujXeL5+mH5sY0vI/8N4qBP7 G2THZMnxiXDKw7rPg4BGSnjWYPps47Whz8Vq+qfabvyirncyXoSHqPJY+20e9mur OmGLWrM8yY0dlNY950fdXBTFBkJmh7K6yu+LU4HbtlFIat95ZZuac= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E64D38F2C; Sat, 8 Jun 2024 15:06:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.204.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D9D7E38F2B; Sat, 8 Jun 2024 15:06:28 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: Patrick Steinhardt , git@vger.kernel.org, Eric Sunshine , Ramsay Jones , Justin Tobler Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/12] refs: implement logic to migrate between ref storage formats In-Reply-To: <20240608113621.GE2966571@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Sat, 8 Jun 2024 07:36:21 -0400") References: <1f26051eff8b7c18bb7114803454611272f84e19.1717402363.git.ps@pks.im> <20240605100318.GA3436391@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20240606070109.GC646308@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20240608113621.GE2966571@coredump.intra.peff.net> Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2024 12:06:27 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 35DD325C-25CA-11EF-B3BD-6488940A682E-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Jeff King writes: > Possibly I should base my daily driver branch on "jch". Like you, there > are many parts of the code I won't exercise day to day. But it would > mean I'd do more testing (and CI) on those topics. The big question is > whether that would introduce a bunch of noise from not-quite-ready > topics being merged to jch. It depends how careful / conservative you > are. :) I am not all that conservative. Especially with the parts of the system that I do not exercise myself.