From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (pb-smtp20.pobox.com [173.228.157.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADA312107 for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2024 16:13:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=173.228.157.52 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711296793; cv=none; b=t3c3QKAIYyuZoLQjjAZLZtpVvrLIKFVt7iS5wCeolD8b1HMYFGFy1FXkGtLAY/r4xcSbbfgUfcSYRNI1G9dr0irIt+j/OhKhkyonJB9PpJDEd/thwPxm390KS6RHvjg+s52vmiSw9L4EH+HMvMF4Y3ZK33KGzuk9hftaPrSZPPw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711296793; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Krccb2t/ACZkTdUNSh6D8cV6Xr4aXnV+ZjdONSTFiX0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=oa70ku0YLQVt5MssFtQejVNtf1gvo+PkcNS5KVyMfR1i7Cr1ggZ/xAxhxQQoRQLK08Fh3djPdQGUaobgKHN1pT61dteFafiPTyefnJ1ObOQPSdyFusKDRewo0d8RPs1yImnyDahRNNBcXaeq+bzs5J6zk+f1WwRVlE/fHse/Am0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=PDWOr1tq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=173.228.157.52 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="PDWOr1tq" Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDCC328CDF; Sun, 24 Mar 2024 12:13:10 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=Krccb2t/ACZkTdUNSh6D8cV6Xr4aXnV+ZjdONS TFiX0=; b=PDWOr1tqH52Ka+BNLSnC+mHl7qdbASsTLgY3gozRzjbKTzAhN13wkM FK2SewaVMam1zKSmMbrYX1gq/DYkJGwxD6d77v75O7HHtoy+cMYiQ7zefXYIClpC 57CY+AE5k+jyaTNeV0HymnuvMuNpjX9JISaf2fsRnLb8rLQo0IauM= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D624628CDE; Sun, 24 Mar 2024 12:13:10 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.139.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6FD8928CDD; Sun, 24 Mar 2024 12:13:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: "brian m. carlson" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Matthew John Cheetham , M Hickford Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] Support for arbitrary schemes in credentials In-Reply-To: (brian m. carlson's message of "Sun, 24 Mar 2024 15:21:03 +0000") References: <20240324011301.1553072-1-sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 09:13:06 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 66BB3AC0-E9F9-11EE-B701-F515D2CDFF5E-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com "brian m. carlson" writes: >> be, as that is better for the world". But I am OK to add less secure >> thing as long as it is an opt-in "easy way out". > > ... Thus, my goal is to make it _possible_ > for people to implement this, but it to make it their responsibility (or > that of a suitable open source project) to do so instead of asking me to > maintain it. That, I think, is a fair and equitable tradeoff for this > situation. Yup, I think we are in agreement. I have no problem with giving them a long rope ;-)