From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A766820958 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 19:31:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752232AbdCWTa7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2017 15:30:59 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:50213 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750952AbdCWTa6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2017 15:30:58 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC22E6710D; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 15:30:51 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=6QZxoTWao8baqoRAYQZd77juzOc=; b=RzXMNR /Coq/teqMuVeVZppH0OrAiyV5BSzI9mu/08HqH9VmrYbn5Nc+xLNyi0+JO11+pYE ptTGbGFCcRV7XIt/k+kzWu5U6gO6E3JaylbjzsSeFQ2Zg7SpYAoQOll0DjTjVCqL x0C2kg+z0BDaprE63WOd74SigxClZ0zidXOyc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=p93sQW9Q/l6VTbl4NtU16kHe/y80NolP 0PX6WypGz2Pkqg0FjE2qP3IHRnau0w3D83v6UyxH9FwnCl8tzvX3sqXmhJtdYv+w y3ws/aVRriJQSJlbCxzcYYecG9sQTbRdgVEqxidNEqXwb6kEXatFRivYRRkDtnsa yVulU8rsVcM= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D52C76710A; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 15:30:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 45F6467105; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 15:30:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Lars Schneider Cc: Jeff King , Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] travis-ci: build and test Git on Windows References: <20170322065612.18797-1-larsxschneider@gmail.com> <20170323180134.geoyvq7qbm5vujo6@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20170323191721.7r5vrixtnx3cngdc@sigill.intra.peff.net> Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 12:30:49 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Lars Schneider's message of "Thu, 23 Mar 2017 20:26:15 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 3972E6B6-0FFF-11E7-B08D-FC50AE2156B6-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Lars Schneider writes: > "[...] we do not provide these values to untrusted builds, > triggered by pull requests from another repository." > > See: https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/environment-variables/#Defining-Variables-in-Repository-Settings OK, it is a releaf to see an indication that somebody over there is thinking. Thanks. So we do _not_ have to turn it off; as soon as we define sekrit variables, they will turn it off for us ;-). >> Hrm, it does mean that people have no way to test on Windows until the >> branch hits pu. Which is not ideal. > > I agree it's not ideal. But I think it is an improvement to check > pu/next/master/maint continuously :-) I am not sure what you mean. We are building each and every branch updates already, and I do not see any improvement over what we are doing now. Care to elaborate?