From: Eugene Sajine <euguess@gmail.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] - git rebase -i performs rebase when it shouldn't?
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 10:06:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <y2s76c5b8581004110706p7b63900aqf90f9c1462a1f637@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100411102255.GB20484@coredump.intra.peff.net>
I got your point about the HEAD which is by default get's added to the
end of the command, so it becomes
git rebase --onto master topic HEAD
I will think about it it more.
I'm pretty sure that i was surprised by the fact that i've got
different behavior in interactive and non-interactive variants, but i
will recheck.
I forgot to mention it was in windows version of git.
I will try to provide the printout of my actions tomorrow when i will
get to this machine.
Thanks a lot,
Eugene
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 6:22 AM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 06:10:53PM -0400, Eugene Sajine wrote:
>
>> Actually no, i was not thinking about what you think i was;). What i
>> was trying to understand with this command (git rebase --onto master
>> topic) is the behavior of the system when the topic branch is indirect
>> descendant of the master and the direct parent of topic (next) is
>> omitted, skipped.
>
> But in "git rebase --onto master topic", the relationship between master
> and topic is irrelevant. It is the same as:
>
> git rebase --onto master topic HEAD
>
> which will consider the range between topic and HEAD as the set of
> commits to rebase.
>
> Did you want to do:
>
> git rebase --onto master next topic
>
> ? That would take the commits between next and topic (i.e., just "topic"
> in your example), and rebuild them on top of master.
>
>> Now the problem i have is that:
>>
>> git rebase -i --onto master topic
>>
>> actually worked and did something, what i would not expect it to do.
>>
>> So, the problem is: non-interactive rebase DOES NOT execute the
>> command, interactive DOES execute.
>
> That's not the result I get. The non-interactive rebase _does_ do the
> same thing. Try this:
>
> mkdir repo
> cd repo
> git init
>
> echo content >>file && git add file && git commit -m one
> git checkout -b next
> echo content >>file && git add file && git commit -m two
> git checkout -b topic
> echo content >>file && git add file && git commit -m three
>
> git rebase --onto master topic
>
> You will see that "topic" has been reset back to commit one, the same as
> master.
>
> If that was not happening before, it was likely because you were not
> actually on the "topic" branch before. So who knows what the implicit
> "HEAD" argument referred to.
>
>> The bug is in the fact that rebase works differently in interactive
>> and non-interactive variants.
>
> I don't think it does, as shown by my example above. If you still think
> so, please create a short test case that demonstrates the difference.
>
> -Peff
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-11 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-09 19:35 [BUG] - git rebase -i performs rebase when it shouldn't? Eugene Sajine
2010-04-10 4:26 ` Jeff King
2010-04-10 4:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-04-10 4:47 ` Jeff King
2010-04-10 19:58 ` Johannes Sixt
2010-04-11 10:15 ` Jeff King
2010-04-11 17:54 ` Johannes Sixt
2010-04-12 1:01 ` Jeff King
2010-04-12 10:50 ` Michal Vitecek
2010-04-12 17:39 ` Johannes Sixt
2010-04-10 22:10 ` Eugene Sajine
2010-04-11 10:22 ` Jeff King
2010-04-11 14:06 ` Eugene Sajine [this message]
2010-04-12 14:09 ` Eugene Sajine
2010-04-12 15:13 ` Johannes Sixt
2010-04-12 15:28 ` Eugene Sajine
2010-04-12 15:47 ` Johannes Sixt
2010-04-13 16:30 ` Eugene Sajine
2010-04-14 6:08 ` Johannes Sixt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=y2s76c5b8581004110706p7b63900aqf90f9c1462a1f637@mail.gmail.com \
--to=euguess@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).