From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71)
	id 1Rrfxe-0003ft-Jy
	for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:23:10 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36565)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rlaager@wiktel.com>) id 1RrfxZ-0003eH-3g
	for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:23:09 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rlaager@wiktel.com>) id 1RrfxU-0004Tw-UG
	for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:23:05 -0500
Received: from spam1.wiktel.com ([69.89.207.151]:56112)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rlaager@wiktel.com>) id 1RrfxU-0004To-Pd
	for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:23:00 -0500
Received: from [172.16.0.253] (thief-pool2-121-14.mncable.net [24.225.121.14])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by spam1.wiktel.com (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with
	ESMTP id q0U1MtGb020042; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 19:22:55 -0600
Subject: Re: [Patch] Robustly search for ZFS labels & uberblocks
From: Richard Laager <rlaager@wiktel.com>
To: Vladimir =?UTF-8?Q?=27=CF=86-coder/phcoder=27?= Serbinenko
	<phcoder@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F23EF3C.9050407@gmail.com>
References: <A304D3F4-D71E-4B50-AF4C-3008327FE7A9@gmail.com>
	<4E838F85.6060001@gmail.com>
	<1326973014.6387.224.camel@watermelon.coderich.net>
	<4F1C1ABD.1010303@gmail.com>
	<C2AFC8B8-54EC-4D2C-824D-C01B2070DBF6@gmail.com>
	<1327719035.9477.68.camel@watermelon.coderich.net>
	<4F23EF3C.9050407@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-Xpi6ZkhrxGBpDMzUwiMY"
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 19:22:54 -0600
Message-ID: <1327886574.2925.49.camel@watermelon.coderich.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 
X-bounce-key: wiktel.com-1; rlaager@wiktel.com; 1327886575;
	SMDT4tPI7kLYZLVeDSh1ykGIWxQ; 
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not
	recognized.
X-Received-From: 69.89.207.151
Cc: grub-devel@gnu.org, Zachary Bedell <pendorbound@gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB <grub-devel@gnu.org>
List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB <grub-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/grub-devel>,
	<mailto:grub-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:grub-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grub-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel>,
	<mailto:grub-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 01:23:09 -0000


--=-Xpi6ZkhrxGBpDMzUwiMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 13:51 +0100, Vladimir '=CF=86-coder/phcoder' Serbinen=
ko wrote:
> As for /proc/mounts : is there a reason to suppose that /proc/mounts
> would work when /proc/self/mountinfo doesn't

/proc/self/mountinfo doesn't exist on older Linux kernels. What is
upstream GRUB's minimum required version of Linux kernel?

--=20
Richard

--=-Xpi6ZkhrxGBpDMzUwiMY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAk8l8OgACgkQbfU6uV4fG85dCgCgmraAygkNwR94jjXu65G5FAIz
cbIAoNiRuFG5AtuKkdYAGpNI2dCOPL3X
=D1oN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-Xpi6ZkhrxGBpDMzUwiMY--