From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71)
	id 1VwOez-0004TT-Tk
	for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 23:04:29 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59885)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <arvidjaar@gmail.com>) id 1VwOeq-0004SR-4Z
	for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 23:04:28 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <arvidjaar@gmail.com>) id 1VwOeh-0002fO-O2
	for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 23:04:20 -0500
Received: from mail-la0-x22e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::22e]:65350)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <arvidjaar@gmail.com>) id 1VwOeh-0002fH-FD
	for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 23:04:11 -0500
Received: by mail-la0-f46.google.com with SMTP id eh20so4045276lab.33
	for <grub-devel@gnu.org>; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 20:04:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:content-type
	:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=yRv+p3jLyJ6+wwdzJhBd4l6NDXPTpv5GgT/+XBdX8zY=;
	b=Qf5L6kwpVKnU0bZNaE9rwQN3sTSCOIfmCsVJzgp2q77jn0+G7DIi1yBLIDr/nt92bj
	fSPuA3CgBTbzQ82J/niH2w2AdHKMC3gmQhdM9BrVnS+LEhWKxn5JtvUuYkpkXVuxk9uK
	+nwlaMAy1q51H0TnHtZG83X41CXGQD0Ngdn+KVXlAOwx9HhQCYzy/GUmT0M2DVG03M+/
	BUtMKHZNwvoykXHPPHSDxgvvkOOA/1GFR9uXQhL5Gpjqbz95iEAQ65+HonslAhwnp584
	bN8GrhnOJ93XlAscAXOtGb6j1VcrPY1DBVXKYDLUgXtSS8h3K6kIIgxikGzQS72+FT06
	TZwg==
X-Received: by 10.152.87.37 with SMTP id u5mr20029786laz.11.1388117050280;
	Thu, 26 Dec 2013 20:04:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.44] (ppp91-76-134-134.pppoe.mtu-net.ru.
	[91.76.134.134])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id m5sm25762705laj.4.2013.12.26.20.04.09
	for <grub-devel@gnu.org> (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Thu, 26 Dec 2013 20:04:09 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <1388117049.918.70.camel@opensuse.site>
Subject: Re: cmosclean command name
From: Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com>
To: grub-devel@gnu.org
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 08:04:09 +0400
In-Reply-To: <20131227022240.GA24294@riva.ucam.org>
References: <20131227022240.GA24294@riva.ucam.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.2 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address
	(bad octet value).
X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c03::22e
X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB <grub-devel@gnu.org>
List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB <grub-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/grub-devel>,
	<mailto:grub-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:grub-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grub-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel>,
	<mailto:grub-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 04:04:28 -0000

В Пт, 27/12/2013 в 02:22 +0000, Colin Watson пишет:
> While writing up NEWS entries for 2.02, I noticed a slight irregularity
> in grub-core/commands/i386/cmostest.c: the "cmosclean" command is
> described as "Clear bit at BYTE:BIT in CMOS.".  Wouldn't the command be
> better named "cmosclear" rather than "cmosclean"?  "Clean" is an odd
> verb to use for this in English.
> 

Sounds fine and is better counterpart to"cmosset".

> If we're going to rename this, we should ideally do it before 2.02.
> 
> Thanks,
>