From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1VwmIl-0004BN-Ok for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 00:19:07 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49694) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VwmIc-0004B6-Fh for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 00:19:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VwmIU-0004pE-2f for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 00:18:58 -0500 Received: from mail-lb0-x22a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::22a]:37016) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VwmIT-0004pA-QP for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 00:18:50 -0500 Received: by mail-lb0-f170.google.com with SMTP id c11so4677339lbj.1 for ; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 21:18:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:content-type :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=r4dR2uK1r2y/fYloxQwuWjbBYneOpepHU/GTUU6iu04=; b=Fs3lu8W0PKyCt+nVvF42O3tXbLJi4s8TAxbKRRgzg24rSMoHQep5456rr9GVKtrxP1 x6O0PN8fTSmDo0HcT95TQxxmGCJTnwtwvYMddV/idklE1N9ycgb4rAE8Cc3FdHh+Le5e KUMczs+QyQo4tDs2MPjVckHI41c2XNZS00beysQXeFiYnSHeYG0sL2to5pGsaF3Cm6Um xy6FIkgU0GlMzoaRQlukNzyXOeAxBDpf0wEWqyVz30HUmF0LfyTDUqYKU8xv1RGOONrf Ue4XV16VXCbBymrLy7/Q1Lt3UtFHjl0a3OWW9vQAX9kQDQ4bD7aKqGAGGmBJ6Bcb2+tc aJ+w== X-Received: by 10.112.128.194 with SMTP id nq2mr71273lbb.84.1388207928787; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 21:18:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.44] (ppp91-76-134-134.pppoe.mtu-net.ru. [91.76.134.134]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id c8sm28933321lag.3.2013.12.27.21.18.48 for (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 27 Dec 2013 21:18:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1388207927.918.86.camel@opensuse.site> Subject: Re: cmosclean command name From: Andrey Borzenkov To: grub-devel@gnu.org Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 09:18:47 +0400 In-Reply-To: <20131228023147.GA5371@riva.ucam.org> References: <20131227022240.GA24294@riva.ucam.org> <1388117049.918.70.camel@opensuse.site> <20131228023147.GA5371@riva.ucam.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c04::22a X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 05:19:07 -0000 В Сб, 28/12/2013 в 02:31 +0000, Colin Watson пишет: > On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 08:04:09AM +0400, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > > В Пт, 27/12/2013 в 02:22 +0000, Colin Watson пишет: > > > While writing up NEWS entries for 2.02, I noticed a slight irregularity > > > in grub-core/commands/i386/cmostest.c: the "cmosclean" command is > > > described as "Clear bit at BYTE:BIT in CMOS.". Wouldn't the command be > > > better named "cmosclear" rather than "cmosclean"? "Clean" is an odd > > > verb to use for this in English. > > > > Sounds fine and is better counterpart to"cmosset". > > I realised that I was wrong that it was introduced in 2.02, though; it > was in fact new in 1.99, so it needs more of an effort at compatibility. > What do people think of this? > > * Rename "cmosclean" command to "cmosclear", leaving an alias for > compatibility. Similarly, rename "GRUB_BUTTON_CMOS_CLEAN" to > "GRUB_BUTTON_CMOS_CLEAR" and leave an alias. > Good occasion to also add description of "GRUB_BUTTON_CMOS_CLEAR" to documentation :)