From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1Vd0QA-0001Ch-7f for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2013 11:21:02 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55011) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vd0Q3-0001CT-R9 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2013 11:21:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vd0Py-0006VX-0i for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2013 11:20:55 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:62958) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vd0Px-0006VN-Ba for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2013 11:20:49 -0500 Received: from scdbackup.webframe.org ([87.167.182.96]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MhhwJ-1VGduG2F4l-00MrGi for ; Sun, 03 Nov 2013 17:20:47 +0100 Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 17:19:51 +0100 From: "Thomas Schmitt" To: grub-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: How important is the MBR partition offset of grub-mkrescue ? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <52767048.9050902@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <52767048.9050902@gmail.com> Message-Id: <15937651386011965065@scdbackup.webframe.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:g6ehux7MQ0VKgX7lgO/5jrThzk/tK+7v9aGPWqLCMfPBBak8Muo J8cKpZpDpM5zmvXWOUoAlgvXPJclwAksUU2fLwVTl1OtISfT9G7XxwW1dVfaW6ZdTAlyvuu ZGWIB08r783Kp1//09VPB6KXn1Em0cSwaznjM067mHCtZLHYd/z860+F3AZIBepf3zffWlK gEmbKHxo7uTzgbztwlmog== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.15 X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 16:21:01 -0000 Hi, > So it's bug in Debian, not in xorriso? xorriso is not at fault. It only follows orders. > It's in our git repo in util/ Yes, i know. But obviously there are older versions around. For re-tinkering the image it would be helpful to know the options used. > grub-mkrescue.c is C one. Oh. I was not aware of that one. I just collected all xorrisofs options of http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/grub.git/tree/util/grub-mkrescue.in Just stunning. Has all this stuff actually been tested ? > FAT would make it look like most common USB stick. You mean a FAT partition with offset 512 bytes towards the start of the ISO filesystem ? But how to keep udev from recognizing the ISO PVD ? (I think i need to find out by what udev rule this link gets created.) Have a nice day :) Thomas