From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1Pa6Pg-00014i-Ch for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 07:54:56 -0500 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53972 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pa6Pd-0000zV-PV for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 07:54:54 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pa6Pc-0002Vl-E1 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 07:54:53 -0500 Received: from smarthost03.mail.zen.net.uk ([212.23.3.142]:50821) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pa6Pc-0002VH-8U for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 07:54:52 -0500 Received: from [82.69.40.219] (helo=riva.pelham.vpn.ucam.org) by smarthost03.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Pa6Pa-0008Sv-FC for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 12:54:50 +0000 Received: from cjwatson by riva.pelham.vpn.ucam.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pa6PZ-00066v-HD for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 12:54:49 +0000 Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 12:54:49 +0000 From: Colin Watson To: The development of GNU GRUB Message-ID: <20110104125449.GC15515@riva.ucam.org> References: <20110104104626.GA15515@riva.ucam.org> <1294144562.7685.6.camel@Nokia-N900-51-1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1294144562.7685.6.camel@Nokia-N900-51-1> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Originating-Smarthost03-IP: [82.69.40.219] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Subject: Re: Regarding ENV variable X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 12:54:54 -0000 On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 01:36:02PM +0100, Andreas Born wrote: > I just quickly tested this behaviour with bash (and busybox). With > neither of them I needed to use eval. Although eval could be a nice > feature, it may be better to consider adapting to this seemingly > common behaviour. Yes, as BVK pointed out I was mistaken. Sorry. -- Colin Watson [cjwatson@ubuntu.com]