From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1VwN4c-0007ml-GR for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 21:22:50 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44126) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VwN4a-0007mL-Pi for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 21:22:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VwN4Z-0001FC-V8 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 21:22:48 -0500 Received: from v6.chiark.greenend.org.uk ([2001:ba8:1e3::]:49521 helo=chiark.greenend.org.uk) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VwN4Z-0001F3-P2 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 21:22:47 -0500 Received: from [172.20.153.9] (helo=riva.pelham.vpn.ucam.org) by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 4.72 #1) with esmtps (return-path cjwatson@ubuntu.com) id 1VwN4X-0005sM-Ox for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 02:22:46 +0000 Received: from ns1.pelham.vpn.ucam.org ([172.20.153.2] helo=riva.ucam.org) by riva.pelham.vpn.ucam.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VwN4U-0006Kr-4f for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 02:22:42 +0000 Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 02:22:40 +0000 From: Colin Watson To: grub-devel@gnu.org Subject: cmosclean command name Message-ID: <20131227022240.GA24294@riva.ucam.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:ba8:1e3:: X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 02:22:49 -0000 While writing up NEWS entries for 2.02, I noticed a slight irregularity in grub-core/commands/i386/cmostest.c: the "cmosclean" command is described as "Clear bit at BYTE:BIT in CMOS.". Wouldn't the command be better named "cmosclear" rather than "cmosclean"? "Clean" is an odd verb to use for this in English. If we're going to rename this, we should ideally do it before 2.02. Thanks, -- Colin Watson [cjwatson@ubuntu.com]