From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1WzA5w-0002VR-Az for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 15:40:00 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39816) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WzA5o-0002Uc-95 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 15:39:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WzA5f-0000xg-3m for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 15:39:52 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x231.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::231]:53169) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WzA5e-0000xb-Qj for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 15:39:43 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id r20so4712185wiv.16 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 12:39:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=berentweb.com; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wlhxnoGw1UxLIbGINIlICPEUGk/wtypSMkEZ9pZ4A3g=; b=VJtMNFqKzkkGV6ZZZSDCrybxI/c0Er3Ks9j7c5KFI9UockLMdnzUamlOzv0N5o5aMn Pm+dplFfhf77ojW2G03K6oVh9uMqRXlAgdAMn8a1L0AKmt87AAd1qaXRzKqhONqwrzxo EAgnRoHql7jPW8YvxUffHVe/HelrYoc9VHgNI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wlhxnoGw1UxLIbGINIlICPEUGk/wtypSMkEZ9pZ4A3g=; b=VQiG4ORqHglQkRCt2oEn/W4i6wFfKUkiDPuUzcwYdBZolLZzOFj2+aXYknJ69XYig4 9u2UUrjY0IhA/tfon6RcITb54pw418vKIAovQWmqCcGC1PKxhCQLLikIGEa4MemYQw50 jUE32j7kBLO/Sn+PVyMfXq/DzF89IwvAbCSEHhHFaF7SDiHRlGt+hTaR86qGqgqZfv3m mnESVRbM4Bypnm5DPeQG7+zWm+0EXLVBvCpK9lCbHaFz6R6Wn1wrA4nD8QCNQrKEtw54 HZ0QiN7QH7olV21gMoESJaLVKTyl6leYPeg4jKxisFHnfhYfJgrDDonxKDiOu2ihEk4w uEwQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlw0aFam3l8z9jViU6V9aODuwkF7PodDcQitVZCamw13j47medLZVqLPePGGzinqv9Yw5U6 X-Received: by 10.180.72.43 with SMTP id a11mr11250680wiv.21.1403552380819; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 12:39:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rsbsd.rsb ([83.66.223.12]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id gc5sm36187776wic.6.2014.06.23.12.39.39 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 23 Jun 2014 12:39:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 22:39:43 +0300 From: Beeblebrox To: The development of GNU GRUB Subject: Re: PXE-Grub has no menu - File not found Message-ID: <20140623223943.15d2a963@rsbsd.rsb> In-Reply-To: References: <20140608092200.55f3c290@opensuse.site> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::231 X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 19:39:58 -0000 I just now updated to latest in trunk, then deleted the gub/i386-pc folder and reinstalled with "grub-mknetdir --net-directory=3D/path/to" At first the PXE-boot process breaks with "Error message: File not found", because the i386-pc folder has perm 700 root:wheel. Only after chmod 755 does that error go away. But, the grub boot process is now showing a new message when it fails: error: Access violation \ Entering rescue mode... \ grub rescue> I ran wireshark during grub-pxe to see where the process was failing. Does the below finding mean anything? 90 7.084908000 192.168.2.1 (tftp root) 192.168.2.34 (pxe client) TFTP=20 63 Error Code, Code: Access violation, Message: Access violation=20 Source File: //boot/grub/i386-pc/normal.mod Opcode: Error Code (5) Error code: Access violation (2) ls -la i386-pc/normal.mod > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel I wanted to make sure that file permission was not the reason so I did "chmod -R 777 i386-pc". This gave the same violation error. Also, why does grub-mknetdir create a 700 folder? Is the folder user supposed to be _dhcp or some other daemon? Regards.