From: Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com>
To: The development of GNU GRUB <grub-devel@gnu.org>
Cc: stanislav.kholmanskikh@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] configure check for ld's --no-relax flag
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 18:53:46 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140804185346.22e2f581@opensuse.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53DF2C02.4030607@oracle.com>
В Mon, 04 Aug 2014 10:45:22 +0400
Stanislav Kholmanskikh <stanislav.kholmanskikh@oracle.com> пишет:
> Hi!
>
> On 08/01/2014 07:40 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> > On 01.08.2014 17:35, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> >> В Fri, 1 Aug 2014 16:15:56 +0400
> >> Stanislav Kholmanskikh <stanislav.kholmanskikh@oracle.com> пишет:
> >>
> >>> Early versions of binutils doesn't support --no-relax flag, so
> >>> commit 063f2a04d158ec1b275a925dfbae74b124708cde prevents building
> >>> with such versions.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kholmanskikh <stanislav.kholmanskikh@oracle.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> conf/Makefile.common | 8 ++++++++
> >>> configure.ac | 10 ++++++++++
> >>> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/conf/Makefile.common b/conf/Makefile.common
> >>> index e4c301f..5bda66f 100644
> >>> --- a/conf/Makefile.common
> >>> +++ b/conf/Makefile.common
> >>> @@ -8,11 +8,19 @@ unexport LC_ALL
> >>> # Platform specific options
> >>> if COND_sparc64_ieee1275
> >>> CFLAGS_PLATFORM += -mno-app-regs
> >>> +if COND_LD_SUPPORTS_NO_RELAX
> >>> LDFLAGS_PLATFORM = -Wl,-melf64_sparc -Wl,--no-relax
> >>> +else
> >>> + LDFLAGS_PLATFORM = -Wl,-melf64_sparc -mno-relax
> >>> +endif
> >>
> >> TBO I think commit should simply be reverted. "Uniformity" is rather
> >> poor excuse for breaking existing systems.
> >>
> > This commit is needed for clang to compile for sparc64. Given that
> > sparc64 clang still doesn't really work I'm ok with reverting, at least
> > for now.
>
> But, it this case, maybe it would be better to consider
> reviewing/applying this patch? Just to not return to this issue after
> some time?
>
> Andrey, Vladimir, what do you think?
>
Yes, commit message was pretty confusing. This leaves the question,
whether combination of clang and binutils that do not support
-Wl,--no-relax exists though :) Otherwise I agree, we should use this
patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-04 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-01 12:15 [RFC PATCH] configure check for ld's --no-relax flag Stanislav Kholmanskikh
2014-08-01 15:35 ` Andrey Borzenkov
2014-08-01 15:40 ` Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
2014-08-04 6:45 ` Stanislav Kholmanskikh
2014-08-04 14:53 ` Andrey Borzenkov [this message]
2014-09-21 17:03 ` Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
2014-09-21 17:50 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2014-09-21 18:14 ` Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140804185346.22e2f581@opensuse.site \
--to=arvidjaar@gmail.com \
--cc=grub-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=stanislav.kholmanskikh@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).