* gnulib update policy
@ 2014-12-07 17:34 Andrei Borzenkov
2015-01-23 18:38 ` Andrei Borzenkov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrei Borzenkov @ 2014-12-07 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: grub-devel
I have two pending patches for gnulib; each one is included upstream.
What is the policy in this case - update individual files, add patches
to be applied at autogen step or update from upstream (latter I'd
rather avoid at this stage)?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: gnulib update policy
2014-12-07 17:34 gnulib update policy Andrei Borzenkov
@ 2015-01-23 18:38 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2015-03-05 17:22 ` Andrei Borzenkov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrei Borzenkov @ 2015-01-23 18:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: grub-devel
В Sun, 7 Dec 2014 20:34:57 +0300
Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com> пишет:
> I have two pending patches for gnulib; each one is included upstream.
> What is the policy in this case - update individual files, add patches
> to be applied at autogen step or update from upstream (latter I'd
> rather avoid at this stage)?
ping?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: gnulib update policy
2015-01-23 18:38 ` Andrei Borzenkov
@ 2015-03-05 17:22 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2015-03-05 18:23 ` Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrei Borzenkov @ 2015-03-05 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: grub-devel
В Fri, 23 Jan 2015 21:38:59 +0300
Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com> пишет:
> В Sun, 7 Dec 2014 20:34:57 +0300
> Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com> пишет:
>
> > I have two pending patches for gnulib; each one is included upstream.
> > What is the policy in this case - update individual files, add patches
> > to be applied at autogen step or update from upstream (latter I'd
> > rather avoid at this stage)?
>
> ping?
I went ahead and committed both. They fix obvious bugs, they are self
contained and do not depend on anything else, they are upstream.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: gnulib update policy
2015-03-05 17:22 ` Andrei Borzenkov
@ 2015-03-05 18:23 ` Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
2015-03-05 18:47 ` Andrei Borzenkov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko @ 2015-03-05 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: The development of GRUB 2
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 798 bytes --]
Thank you. Do you know how big the gnulib update would be?
В Fri, 23 Jan 2015 21:38:59 +0300
Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com> пишет:
> В Sun, 7 Dec 2014 20:34:57 +0300
> Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com> пишет:
>
> > I have two pending patches for gnulib; each one is included upstream.
> > What is the policy in this case - update individual files, add patches
> > to be applied at autogen step or update from upstream (latter I'd
> > rather avoid at this stage)?
>
> ping?
I went ahead and committed both. They fix obvious bugs, they are self
contained and do not depend on anything else, they are upstream.
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1275 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: gnulib update policy
2015-03-05 18:23 ` Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
@ 2015-03-05 18:47 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2015-03-05 19:04 ` Andrei Borzenkov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrei Borzenkov @ 2015-03-05 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko; +Cc: The development of GRUB 2
В Thu, 5 Mar 2015 19:23:35 +0100
"Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko" <phcoder@gmail.com> пишет:
> Thank you. Do you know how big the gnulib update would be?
I was reluctant to do full update before 2.02. Even external-inline.m4
contains far more changes than I would prefer in this case.
Here is git diff --shortstat for files included in grub assuming they
do not have additional dependencies.
115 files changed, 1003 insertions(+), 521 deletions(-)
> В Fri, 23 Jan 2015 21:38:59 +0300
> Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com> пишет:
>
> > В Sun, 7 Dec 2014 20:34:57 +0300
> > Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com> пишет:
> >
> > > I have two pending patches for gnulib; each one is included upstream.
> > > What is the policy in this case - update individual files, add patches
> > > to be applied at autogen step or update from upstream (latter I'd
> > > rather avoid at this stage)?
> >
> > ping?
>
> I went ahead and committed both. They fix obvious bugs, they are self
> contained and do not depend on anything else, they are upstream.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Grub-devel mailing list
> Grub-devel@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: gnulib update policy
2015-03-05 18:47 ` Andrei Borzenkov
@ 2015-03-05 19:04 ` Andrei Borzenkov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrei Borzenkov @ 2015-03-05 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko; +Cc: The development of GRUB 2
В Thu, 5 Mar 2015 21:47:42 +0300
Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com> пишет:
> В Thu, 5 Mar 2015 19:23:35 +0100
> "Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko" <phcoder@gmail.com> пишет:
>
> > Thank you. Do you know how big the gnulib update would be?
>
> I was reluctant to do full update before 2.02. Even external-inline.m4
> contains far more changes than I would prefer in this case.
>
> Here is git diff --shortstat for files included in grub assuming they
> do not have additional dependencies.
>
> 115 files changed, 1003 insertions(+), 521 deletions(-)
>
That was without m4 ...
867 files changed, 3025 insertions(+), 1812 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 m4/count-trailing-zeros.m4
create mode 100644 m4/gc-hmac-sha256.m4
create mode 100644 m4/gc-hmac-sha512.m4
create mode 100644 m4/gc-sha256.m4
create mode 100644 m4/gc-sha512.m4
create mode 100644 m4/gl-openssl.m4
create mode 100644 m4/obstack.m4
create mode 100644 m4/qsort_r.m4
>
> > В Fri, 23 Jan 2015 21:38:59 +0300
> > Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com> пишет:
> >
> > > В Sun, 7 Dec 2014 20:34:57 +0300
> > > Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com> пишет:
> > >
> > > > I have two pending patches for gnulib; each one is included upstream.
> > > > What is the policy in this case - update individual files, add patches
> > > > to be applied at autogen step or update from upstream (latter I'd
> > > > rather avoid at this stage)?
> > >
> > > ping?
> >
> > I went ahead and committed both. They fix obvious bugs, they are self
> > contained and do not depend on anything else, they are upstream.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Grub-devel mailing list
> > Grub-devel@gnu.org
> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-03-05 19:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-12-07 17:34 gnulib update policy Andrei Borzenkov
2015-01-23 18:38 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2015-03-05 17:22 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2015-03-05 18:23 ` Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
2015-03-05 18:47 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2015-03-05 19:04 ` Andrei Borzenkov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).