From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1RKB0P-00015I-HT for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 11:39:33 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:56427) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RKB0M-000151-I2 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 11:39:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RKB0L-0001gq-5X for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 11:39:30 -0400 Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:61473) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RKB0L-0001er-0M for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 11:39:29 -0400 Received: by mail-wy0-f169.google.com with SMTP id 34so5788179wyg.0 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 08:39:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; bh=MAMWB6q8SDGaKOLZ98Xd7H80urqgzMx4tHnU5UA9F3g=; b=cu7n6jIQWTqhVWUJRBSobt0RAylw69MxgAKzqFdc4Do7fotJ2GxTeE/PiaZ6hTZpO9 u+9dLsKLEkO8X269Kg9TG4tN3Mzg7cZaVDz6Q2/i8WTop+mmGe+fbI2oBGLCowdxtD9N /9kxgsuv/hM61hJk+3RKotuR2I8K3hmtRW79o= Received: by 10.216.171.202 with SMTP id r52mr2242899wel.93.1319902766776; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 08:39:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian.x201.phnet (gprs17.swisscom-mobile.ch. [193.247.250.17]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e7sm21796637wbh.12.2011.10.29.08.39.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 29 Oct 2011 08:39:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4EAC1DCA.4040809@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 17:37:46 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?VmxhZGltaXIgJ8+GLWNvZGVyL3BoY29kZXInIFNlcmJpbmVua28=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20111005 Iceowl/1.0b2 Icedove/3.1.15 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The development of GNU GRUB Subject: Re: AFS and BFS removed. Unacceptable license. References: <4EABC96A.70904@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigEE723B6357D9EB78109993FC" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 74.125.82.169 Cc: Dee Sharpe X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 15:39:32 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigEE723B6357D9EB78109993FC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 29.10.2011 17:22, Dee Sharpe wrote: > Ok, so I'd assume that the AFS driver needs to be rewritten. Is it abso= lutely mandatory that copyright be assigned to the FSF? > They need to be rewritten. Assignment can be discussed. I've already done a part of BFS (using "practical file system design" book as a reference) and since AFS is similar it can use same file with some defines. So it should Actually if you want to help what I need the most is the way of mkfs and write to AFS (or as a variant something which already generates AFS with files on it like xorriso can do for iso9660) for automated testing purpos= es. It has to run on my testing system (Debian GNU/Linux) > A. Demetrious Sharpe > > It's not a question of why I'm better than you, > it's a question of why you're not as good as me. > The fact that you fail to see the difference between the two, answers b= oth questions! > > Sent from my iPhone4 > > On Oct 29, 2011, at 4:37 AM, Vladimir '=CF=86-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko= wrote: > >> An unfortunate discovery has been done: our AFS code is based on >> fsys_afs.c and afs.h from Syllable GRUB Legacy. The files in question >> are not under FSF copyright, not licence-compatible and it wasn't >> announced what's the code based on when the patch was sent or committe= d. >> While first one is a minor issue I could grant exception for, the 2 >> other ones are fatal. I remind to all of you that a license-incompatib= le >> can put the whole project in jeopardy and the need of both announcing >> where code came from (refer to your copyright assignment if you have >> one) and proper acknowledgement and traceability. The later is very >> important if the code can come from several possible sources. In this >> case if the code has been based on Haiku's BFS it would have been fine= , >> unfortunately it wasn't, without proper traceability it's hard to >> differentiate between such cases. >> >> --=20 >> Regards >> Vladimir '=CF=86-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Grub-devel mailing list >> Grub-devel@gnu.org >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel > _______________________________________________ > Grub-devel mailing list > Grub-devel@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel --=20 Regards Vladimir '=CF=86-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko --------------enigEE723B6357D9EB78109993FC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREKAAYFAk6sHcoACgkQNak7dOguQgl7bgD/QopDNDWuZJZ1/qMlqUJlWTEw A9MxAkZte20giXkE1fUA/0kO5uXaMUBJez943l4wi9B78gX3z/YyedHDvfwXBxzo =UtxK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigEE723B6357D9EB78109993FC--