From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1RKX4O-0007ZN-C0 for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 11:13:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:56347) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RKX4L-0007XJ-Dk for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 11:13:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RKX4J-0001FM-MX for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 11:13:05 -0400 Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:48688) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RKX4J-0001F8-Eh for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 11:13:03 -0400 Received: by wyg24 with SMTP id 24so86660wyg.0 for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 08:13:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; bh=341orENgjpZrzXMch7DrNsqtqw6UBEjqjRsUreox3mM=; b=gzUPzjklu94MkFXrk0fA209/AdHCudEKchVnC077bDEchBDLu8Eq993ixAICQQJlVB u8E9OBDahPO/Yy4bC55X/9Pj9ufHIfiG5J3BlUXy1DCs622ned+XXbVSxmdTuF2qwOIZ YLUioUG4zyQQxzn4RFcR1XIKcz1yEiQ6XJbVI= Received: by 10.216.14.206 with SMTP id d56mr2126469wed.33.1319987581068; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 08:13:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian.x201.phnet (6-156.203-62.cust.bluewin.ch. [62.203.156.6]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ek13sm27153199wbb.3.2011.10.30.08.12.59 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 30 Oct 2011 08:12:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4EAD6979.7000004@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 16:12:57 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?VmxhZGltaXIgJ8+GLWNvZGVyL3BoY29kZXInIFNlcmJpbmVua28=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20111005 Iceowl/1.0b2 Icedove/3.1.15 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: grub-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: AFS and BFS removed. Unacceptable license. References: <4EABC96A.70904@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig1EAB63BEE8B66512D352A649" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 74.125.82.169 X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 15:13:06 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig1EAB63BEE8B66512D352A649 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 29.10.2011 17:22, Dee Sharpe wrote: > Ok, so I'd assume that the AFS driver needs to be rewritten. Is it abso= lutely mandatory that copyright be assigned to the FSF? > I rewrote both BFS and AFS (which is a minor modification to the former). Can you give me the tools (mkfs + a way to write to AFS) necessarily to automatically test it for regressions in future? > Sent from my iPhone4 Please avoid posting such advertisements here. > On Oct 29, 2011, at 4:37 AM, Vladimir '=CF=86-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko= wrote: > >> An unfortunate discovery has been done: our AFS code is based on >> fsys_afs.c and afs.h from Syllable GRUB Legacy. The files in question >> are not under FSF copyright, not licence-compatible and it wasn't >> announced what's the code based on when the patch was sent or committe= d. >> While first one is a minor issue I could grant exception for, the 2 >> other ones are fatal. I remind to all of you that a license-incompatib= le >> can put the whole project in jeopardy and the need of both announcing >> where code came from (refer to your copyright assignment if you have >> one) and proper acknowledgement and traceability. The later is very >> important if the code can come from several possible sources. In this >> case if the code has been based on Haiku's BFS it would have been fine= , >> unfortunately it wasn't, without proper traceability it's hard to >> differentiate between such cases. >> >> --=20 >> Regards >> Vladimir '=CF=86-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Grub-devel mailing list >> Grub-devel@gnu.org >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel > _______________________________________________ > Grub-devel mailing list > Grub-devel@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel --=20 Regards Vladimir '=CF=86-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko --------------enig1EAB63BEE8B66512D352A649 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREKAAYFAk6taXkACgkQNak7dOguQgnS2QEAmFYngiyBAQNHE4HxGkNrXVog FgYE/zHVqXGAI6PDGaABAMJ16iXJDM/bzRFHl3xLJIaQR7Pw36gYToO6NfEv18X3 =zz7c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig1EAB63BEE8B66512D352A649--