Re: New command to check NT's hibernation state

["Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko" <phcoder@gmail.com>]

Hello.
On 02.12.2011 06:16, Peter Lustig wrote:
>> Thanks for this. However the coding style isn't according to our 
>> standards. Could you adjust to the standard? I recommend looking at 
>> other code and reading GNU Coding Standard. E.g. we don't use {0} 
>> initialiser, return value of commands, C++ comments or M$-$tyle 
>> variables. 
>
> Sorry about that.  I've reviewed the standard and perused the source 
> tree, as you suggested, to determine the best style.  Attached is my 
> updated file.
>
Much better. There are still few problems like the arbitrary limit (we 
avoid any arbitrary limits, you have one easy to avoid on filename 
length). Also we don't use such ABORT macros as they offer no 
readability advantage. Review in more details when time permits.
> Glad to be of help,
> Peter Lustig
>
> P.S.  Do you know if there are any plans in the future to implement 
> write operations for filesystems?  (I noticed raw disk writing is 
> currently supported.)  If not, is the reason due to the technical 
> challenges (e.g. NTFS only had read-only access in GNU/Linux for quite 
> a while) or just a general lack of interest?
Neither. Reliability concerns. Writing to filesystem is potentially 
dangerous and needs to be throughly tested. Since writing is rare for 
bootloader we won't receive enough testing of these code pathes so every 
write will remain a risk. We can't have such risks.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Grub-devel mailing list
> Grub-devel@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel


-- 
Regards
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko