From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1RrgHi-0005Ws-3e for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:43:54 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43809) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrgHf-0005V2-Ka for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:43:52 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrgHe-0006nz-H0 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:43:51 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:65126) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrgHe-0006nu-Ad for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:43:50 -0500 Received: by wera13 with SMTP id a13so3391183wer.0 for ; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 17:43:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vw6BPkjbs4FqZMwejsgY2a8t10SsbF8psrMobQs65Us=; b=O1wErQN4RlN1qgHQguSpKuhpiMzGGocy9yDmBY/vUY3Y02n4kJ1gJ2fZpTFOYL+Eg6 JIsrTPK1GZ8CPg7TS8ssyqUrtgk03vihGTAywt0/LL1bH+HC8xNxzfevaev2OJqSmlj+ CGDzZHJvAPWYpm7R+VFZ6PlSa+gmpb2wDD0kE= Received: by 10.180.96.230 with SMTP id dv6mr24174691wib.11.1327887829289; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 17:43:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from fedora.x201.phnet (7-77.203-62.cust.bluewin.ch. [62.203.77.7]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id eq5sm47525784wib.2.2012.01.29.17.43.47 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 29 Jan 2012 17:43:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F25F5D2.60104@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 02:43:46 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?VmxhZGltaXIgJ8+GLWNvZGVyL3BoY29kZXInIFNlcmJpbmVua28=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Laager Subject: Re: [Patch] Robustly search for ZFS labels & uberblocks References: <4E838F85.6060001@gmail.com> <1326973014.6387.224.camel@watermelon.coderich.net> <4F1C1ABD.1010303@gmail.com> <1327719035.9477.68.camel@watermelon.coderich.net> <4F23EF3C.9050407@gmail.com> <1327886574.2925.49.camel@watermelon.coderich.net> In-Reply-To: <1327886574.2925.49.camel@watermelon.coderich.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 74.125.82.169 Cc: grub-devel@gnu.org, Zachary Bedell X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 01:43:52 -0000 On 30.01.2012 02:22, Richard Laager wrote: > On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 13:51 +0100, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: >> As for /proc/mounts : is there a reason to suppose that /proc/mounts >> would work when /proc/self/mountinfo doesn't > /proc/self/mountinfo doesn't exist on older Linux kernels. What is > upstream GRUB's minimum required version of Linux kernel? > Any of 2.x or 3.x line should work. However on older ones we just scan /dev to find a device with the same major/minor as the one we've got from stat (). It's possible to try to use mtab or /proc/mounts as hint while still checking for major/minor match but it's not important. Also I don't suppose anyone will use ZFS with older kernels -- Regards Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko