Re: [PATCH] Ignore symlink traversal failures in grub-mount readdir

["Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko" <phcoder@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2249 bytes --]

On 09.03.2013 17:47, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:

> В Fri, 12 Oct 2012 17:09:54 +0100
> Colin Watson <cjwatson@ubuntu.com> пишет:
> 
>> This is very much a temporary hack, so I'm sending it here for
>> discussion rather than just committing it even though it's quite simple.
>>
>> r3036.1.15 introduced support for filling in the attributes of files in
>> fuse_readdir.  However, symlinks to directories are passed to call_fill
>> with info.dir unset; call_fill will then try to open them with
>> grub_file_open, and get GRUB_ERR_BAD_FILE_TYPE because it's ultimately a
>> directory not a regular file.  It then causes the whole readdir call to
>> fail.  The net effect is that if you, for example, have a symlink
>> anywhere in the top level of a filesystem, then the entire filesystem
>> appears empty in grub-mount.  This is the root cause of
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1051306.
>>
>> I think that the proper solution is to pass the full
>> grub_fshelp_filetype to dirhook functions, which would permit
>> implementing true symlink support in grub-mount.  That would be a fairly
>> large change that I don't have time for at the moment.  As a stopgap, I
>> suggest that we ignore errors from individual grub_file_open calls
>> during fuse_readdir.  How does this patch look?
>>
> 
> The only reason to call grub_file_open() is to fetch file size, and file
> size is already available when hooks are called. So what about patch
> below? It fixes problem for me, and it trivial enough. This allows
> directory listing to work again. I can extend it with info.is_link to
> return proper filetype to FUSE, but implementing full support needs
> adding readlink that is a separate topic.
> 
> I tested it with ext4 and cpio and it works. Testing on more systems
> (in particular, NTFS, which is the only one with non-trivial change) is
> appreciated.
> 

Some time ago I made a similar patch but for another motivation: current
code is way too inefficient for large directories as you have to rescan
directory for every file. The problem with this patch is 10 bytes
increase of core.img. This may be acceptable given this problem (it
happens in ls on runtime as well) and inefficency of scanning.


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 294 bytes --]