From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1VfYOx-0007dv-GJ for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 12:02:19 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57758) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VfYOn-0007dP-HA for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 12:02:17 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VfYOc-0004nP-BT for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 12:02:09 -0500 Received: from mail-ea0-x230.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c01::230]:65074) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VfYOc-0004nB-4W for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 12:01:58 -0500 Received: by mail-ea0-f176.google.com with SMTP id m14so1749569eaj.7 for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 09:01:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type; bh=1IPqtPcKONwAC1RW5e5tUWj1/mSvkqplafH4lIf/8Zc=; b=lYGCzJ6Vw6THdp9VjjIcNdriqiPl1P51VH9303gtyGCmQaWVqfh9ndFiPtrSTM9QoF 8CXWFlJ23G1eG2dTxx1M5fbzmXbxKIXZlWeV9TahHAWJLbut2eiVRGFjHBWf65g7T2Sn QA6zd4z2cbd/pgDioI6TCyNoU1cUmK0Hk8MxG9Pa0ZBaCkK0VyEpROB3sLqZpBzMOf+C 15yo9JaIakq1wAWj7CvlNWGISPYLi4MfW8ECDJj9ai5M4QmiyhZ5er6opvidWAlf7v12 WG13rYiWnohYzASP+YywWx4I4wTWfHnk2CsTAxbkMJNiuWnrkSKVrzq+odkAWCxh+Bv4 NEVQ== X-Received: by 10.14.1.130 with SMTP id 2mr30459275eed.24.1384102916835; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 09:01:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.16] (31-249.1-85.cust.bluewin.ch. [85.1.249.31]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id k7sm43207950eeg.13.2013.11.10.09.01.55 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 10 Nov 2013 09:01:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <527FBC01.5010509@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 18:01:53 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?VmxhZGltaXIgJ8+GLWNvZGVyL3BoY29kZXInIFNlcmJpbmVua28=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131005 Icedove/17.0.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The development of GRUB 2 Subject: GIT workflow X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="----enig2POHQGSPNQLLVPNVSDHHJ" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4013:c01::230 X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 17:02:18 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) ------enig2POHQGSPNQLLVPNVSDHHJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, all. We've switched to git some time ago, now we should have some kind of workflow documents. In particular I think of following points: - Developpers with commit access can create branches as they see fit as long as it's prefixed by their name and they don't do sth nasty like storing binary or unrelated files. - When committing bigger work should we merge or squash? I think that squash should be possible if developper desires. Is there any reason to use merges? - Which commits should we sign? All? Some? Official releases? ------enig2POHQGSPNQLLVPNVSDHHJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/ iF4EAREKAAYFAlJ/vAEACgkQmBXlbbo5nOuNdgEAifBifsjK4jza5TiteH9zR89Z /3rtGL2tQdilj1LF+XoBAJ+UWPDXZG3r9Ss3z/vFy7ezfmmQa/jeWsxhk9x7cQOP =09dF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------enig2POHQGSPNQLLVPNVSDHHJ--