From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1VpIgM-0002ue-MQ for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Dec 2013 09:16:34 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36955) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VpIgC-0002tJ-GD for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Dec 2013 09:16:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VpIg2-0000ZB-FS for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Dec 2013 09:16:24 -0500 Received: from mail-ee0-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c00::236]:46366) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VpIg2-0000Yz-82 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Dec 2013 09:16:14 -0500 Received: by mail-ee0-f54.google.com with SMTP id e51so758358eek.41 for ; Sat, 07 Dec 2013 06:16:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=6OrLw8iAxwl7rluJGho4tAM2Sd41OVlR0qGEeWEhzoQ=; b=Ynxb4hfZwOtnAQbiTHsgEOTrShvXBMnm2sWG8xhGaDbInNlQsEhu9knhi3XIyjSQrc Af0jX+nGo/lUKOZGrFt2Yg5rHPxyM6igNP9aVg7zkLe0mUeFOGShMkcuyyxu7K5TxOEm 2JoaK1kjsxfpJouFIhThgxBDRIPyMSFXZ1r2gBByGxJ0CqSye2wa6OwY4R3mhgWVDKJq ILyPQiNBGYuD2UedhT5HA+4ehSjGqn/jf/UrS/lJ1+ruFCLsly2J40A3vsZ4pq0ilkMC 9xEHUckoDByF+7ImIjCIIGpuP/u8gQUQ/ifZmP6PxxBmr0FUp/EApR8i8kKl7KL2M/fn SA4g== X-Received: by 10.14.0.201 with SMTP id 49mr6436119eeb.38.1386425773539; Sat, 07 Dec 2013 06:16:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.16] (85-188.196-178.cust.bluewin.ch. [178.196.188.85]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n1sm6839199eep.20.2013.12.07.06.16.12 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 07 Dec 2013 06:16:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52A32DAB.5030301@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2013 15:16:11 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?VmxhZGltaXIgJ8+GLWNvZGVyL3BoY29kZXInIFNlcmJpbmVua28=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131005 Icedove/17.0.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The development of GRUB 2 Subject: Re: [RFT] LUA build system adjustments References: <52983A32.9020806@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <52983A32.9020806@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="----enig2TDRAKKGHAKAEBWLOELWO" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4013:c00::236 X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2013 14:16:33 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) ------enig2TDRAKKGHAKAEBWLOELWO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 29.11.2013 07:54, Vladimir '=CF=86-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > Current LUA status for non-x86 is pretty horrible. Attached is a patch > which fixes some of issues. Could someone test it? Testing on x86 shoul= d > be enough. > Could someone propose a test for LUA which could be run as part of > all_functional_test if lua is compiled to avoid regressions in LUA. >=20 I've committed it blindly. However, lack of any response to it probbaly means that we'll have to drop lua altogether at some point in the future.= ------enig2TDRAKKGHAKAEBWLOELWO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/ iF4EAREKAAYFAlKjLasACgkQmBXlbbo5nOvYmwD/YFDxo8nkD/h6+WXZVNMhCigG 9MArDOdH3spCIteF6WUA/03qEkraokxyJww9mdQxYsSDci4T+emn1hUyHSxDkDBv =pivw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------enig2TDRAKKGHAKAEBWLOELWO--