From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1W0EKl-0003lS-7i for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 12:51:27 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51718) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0EKe-0003lD-PW for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 12:51:26 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0EKZ-0001U2-Em for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 12:51:20 -0500 Received: from mail-ee0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c00::229]:46828) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0EKZ-0001Tn-7T for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 12:51:15 -0500 Received: by mail-ee0-f41.google.com with SMTP id t10so8160517eei.28 for ; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 09:51:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=LXAtslNaBhslcm9Z1Pjvy0UJXQrEjZc9Y+4mPGp0Sdk=; b=mSrGncshookueVY+lQhJgi+27ueW07+fIN8dXV4nun6DDnPJA50Ucn3zUxnC3Hbej9 Wt/wKd5dH5v0dv4QrGWfTrazFoyXrocwcHwLjU5x+VblvhRvlyEG1hmRb8FrVCIcfoOc 4uSKS0QqdFLQgvr6+A07GoQ1xnODlDWw03bGgQV7kbK07y4lygjKiqGK87jULQmoLQrP vkZdPe2LwIUp/ab20YdXBaArrIcQrByM9GTi5AP0a6azRrs4IZSG/xZmWdBJdAHFHxAo 8hPiXaGrY+V2WYKgijkffcgl40QNIuBcijYN0k1WJx899x/xRnBwvFleuhNevTpPeiuk apnA== X-Received: by 10.14.241.130 with SMTP id g2mr3718123eer.106.1389030673631; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 09:51:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.16] (85-188.196-178.cust.bluewin.ch. [178.196.188.85]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id a51sm172860871eeh.8.2014.01.06.09.51.11 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 06 Jan 2014 09:51:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52CAED08.9040007@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 18:51:04 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?VmxhZGltaXIgJ8+GLWNvZGVyL3BoY29kZXInIFNlcmJpbmVua28=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131103 Icedove/17.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The development of GNU GRUB Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix name of default boot image on AArch64 References: <1388566476-1312-1-git-send-email-arvidjaar@gmail.com> <20140106113425.GG29433@bivouac.eciton.net> <1389025771.918.202.camel@opensuse.site> In-Reply-To: <1389025771.918.202.camel@opensuse.site> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="c8f3pPvjWtOxGLELSTLTGfsREV3MeGIri" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4013:c00::229 X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 17:51:26 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --c8f3pPvjWtOxGLELSTLTGfsREV3MeGIri Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 06.01.2014 17:29, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > =D0=92 =D0=9F=D0=BD, 06/01/2014 =D0=B2 11:34 +0000, Leif Lindholm =D0=BF= =D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: >> On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 12:54:36PM +0400, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: >>> According to UEFI 2.4 specification, default boot file name on AArch6= 4 >>> is BOOTAA64.EFI (3.4.1.1 Removable Media Boot Behavior). >>> >>> --- >>> util/grub-install.c | 2 +- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/util/grub-install.c b/util/grub-install.c >>> index 8cfe0ea..d3b9db7 100644 >>> --- a/util/grub-install.c >>> +++ b/util/grub-install.c >>> @@ -1091,7 +1091,7 @@ main (int argc, char *argv[]) >>> efi_file =3D "BOOTARM.EFI"; >>> break; >>> case GRUB_INSTALL_PLATFORM_ARM64_EFI: >>> - efi_file =3D "BOOTAARCH64.EFI"; >>> + efi_file =3D "BOOTAA64.EFI"; >>> break; >>> default: >>> grub_util_error ("%s", _("You've found a bug")); >>> --=20 >>> tg: (668add2..) u/aarch64-default-boot (depends on: master) >> >> Oops - muscle memory override. >> My only excuse is that current Tianocore Bds for arm* is not conforman= t >> to the removable media boot behaviour, so this could not currently be >> tested. Fixing this is on my to-do list for Q1. >> Could this be applied please? >> >=20 > Should not grubarm64 be changed into grubaa64 as well, even to just fit= > into 8+3 name? Having them consistent makes life easier. And now is jus= t > the right point in time before name is set in stone. >=20 Agreed. Could you do it? >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Grub-devel mailing list > Grub-devel@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel >=20 --c8f3pPvjWtOxGLELSTLTGfsREV3MeGIri Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/ iF4EAREKAAYFAlLK7Q4ACgkQmBXlbbo5nOuYmQD+OTxZJP5+BxWLToClN0XgFcs3 /7qGWRo3LTfERUxGi4MBAIMZrG8elnZOfJVulllgTSkpclQ35lkLR+9eaAWmN/fw =Ve0j -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --c8f3pPvjWtOxGLELSTLTGfsREV3MeGIri--