From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1XVjkl-00009Q-1z for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 12:12:47 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36339) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XVjka-00008x-FR for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 12:12:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XVjkR-00078a-EZ for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 12:12:36 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::236]:39107) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XVjkR-00076v-85 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 12:12:27 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id q59so1775242wes.13 for ; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 09:12:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=SKtU6Xo41FWDoY+wA0WEue/M5T/0Kt3AtN57mTiEXsk=; b=vCa2PAdfnlqmwm45PRWBgLA69qmm2s12XC3z1LoZQlgeIjAhzMesnw636A9SbeJZKE QzmywCcM5NDkvv/DI40pfEGT6mWq9y99B6CgJBhYWTTqUwjLc8fDR60RJ5T2b/18nkDO NMWKYJNxhue2n+6yELw6ZElU1mdmBQrleKEC962djT4ShZ1nO2wjQCbKQ+bVU6b/qQpZ kQM2jPWUJMImigHzfJpK9Fd+9CfdEgtAyNdjeXYUYLhgOXfEDHRNPSyImJkp7GpjfCLC TALtWPpcDItnaN+PCD6NWl35wpnEgFy2o7JSXr5kmXAeBFEbDjq4H4vs/xrEpfa/5M5/ 6E8w== X-Received: by 10.194.243.161 with SMTP id wz1mr15212521wjc.0.1411315505690; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 09:05:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.42.4] (160-228.197-178.cust.bluewin.ch. [178.197.228.160]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ec18sm9119507wic.0.2014.09.21.09.05.04 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 21 Sep 2014 09:05:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <541EF72E.9030904@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 18:05:02 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?VmxhZGltaXIgJ8+GLWNvZGVyL3BoY29kZXInIFNlcmJpbmVua28=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The development of GNU GRUB Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] Add powerpc little-endian (ppc64le) flags References: <1409255765-3209-1-git-send-email-pfsmorigo@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1409255765-3209-2-git-send-email-pfsmorigo@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140917220444.GA8777@beren.chocolate> In-Reply-To: <20140917220444.GA8777@beren.chocolate> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uT9hHnOpoPMi5c8BvJiQXnPKxNn8Acncq" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c03::236 X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 16:12:45 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --uT9hHnOpoPMi5c8BvJiQXnPKxNn8Acncq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 18.09.2014 00:04, Paulo Flabiano Smorigo wrote: > +if test x$target_cpu =3D xpowerpc && test x$ac_cv_c_bigendian =3D xno;= then This should be done before endianness check as endianness check may have other influences as well. Also I think you got the check from host, not target. AFAIR target doesn't use endian check at all, which makes this patch unsuitable for cross-compile. Could you send your latest patch version in new thread? I'm pretty confused with this thread. --uT9hHnOpoPMi5c8BvJiQXnPKxNn8Acncq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iF4EAREKAAYFAlQe9y4ACgkQmBXlbbo5nOsyCAEAq2UIwAdMYf2Y2SFQGGtULdJ3 MfdUNxYBNDcMMESge+IA/2PcXbdMdze/M08uHVZVaJ0lWog5qQfgbfSFPQ7XRhGs =Im2e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uT9hHnOpoPMi5c8BvJiQXnPKxNn8Acncq--