From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1Xe3EJ-0005Pz-Mt for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:37:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54201) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xe3E8-0005Oh-4t for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:37:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xe3Dz-0005u3-2w for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:37:28 -0400 Received: from web006.ispnoc.net ([2a00:1ca8:e:2::8476:d9ce]:45412) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xe3Dy-0005tz-T2 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:37:19 -0400 Received: from 236.193.187.81.in-addr.arpa ([81.187.193.236] helo=[192.168.1.100]) by web006.ispnoc.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Xe3Da-0001zE-EP; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 16:36:54 +0200 Message-ID: <543D351C.8040009@gluglug.org.uk> Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 15:37:16 +0100 From: The Gluglug User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: arvidjaar@gmail.com, grub-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: build issue with 631a820: missing initialiser [-Werror=missing-field-initializers] References: CAA91j0VcpHPy5XuBZUkz0dcTT+YTPiCtk12NSiBLeTwzo++shQ@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1ca8:e:2::8476:d9ce X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 14:37:37 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > Hmm ... it builds fine here, with gcc 4.8. What compiler and > version? GCC 4.6.3 Distro: Trisquel 6 (based on Ubuntu 12.04). So I should upgrade GCC? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUPTUcAAoJEP9Ft0z50c+UZNoH/3sg50rNfAkG8txSM+5WOhHb bZkmhbcYEKi0IlcCGoDSXh4A/vdZsUtkDtZv0lglSvfq2quNGcjfvW4OowekFe6F 4ZacBaaCb2kgNLivBXQXXoWcuVSxxzK0w0UJi7DCCBSE1EXBRoyiNSgvaHjiSzPd Wn9jPrMEfomdFPyUlI1VWaoryiTSItUGHw/lHQrE7qtzhtSZfCdH5HdQvt0ZQNG4 tWy8V6JYtvXn+8aavyrFyzLWu4Uka6pvMEMfG4j1dhaMVmpC35bM6ciEFSV8/GL/ qUnr4d8XJdPFdDmZQ9GEiV/rlbPt+dta1WXFNPvX+0MCYvIV59xVgKiNMjMPP4A= =JGgT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----