From: Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com>
To: grub-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] disk: Add support for device-specific malloc function
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 22:46:16 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56D5F188.6010306@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF7UmSwm3d79Yw4Wz+xwpP97e4re6rsqxkyB5+r8=J6z2F8K2Q@mail.gmail.com>
01.03.2016 20:11, Leif Lindholm пишет:
> On 24 February 2016 at 17:40, Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 24.02.2016 16:57, Leif Lindholm пишет:
>>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 03:09:13PM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>>>>>> Could you test attached patch with your alignment fixes on top. This
>>>>>> implements my idea of using shared buffers. Seems to work in naive testing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Testing this with a grub-mkstandalone image, I get:
>>>>>
>>>>> kern/dl.c:556: flushing 0x10f1 bytes at 0x9ffb5ac20
>>>>> kern/dl.c:649: module name: tar
>>>>> kern/dl.c:650: init function: 0x9ffb5b220
>>>>> kern/disk.c:217: Opening `memdisk'...
>>>>> kern/fs.c:56: Detecting tarfs...
>>>>>
>>>>> And then spectacular crash in UEFI due to an EL2 translation fault.
>>>>
>>>> To be sure - is it with my patch alone or with your patches? If some
>>>> more patches are used - could you send exact diff to trunk to avoid
>>>> misunderstanding?
>>>
>>> Double checked with only your patch on top of
>>> 1b782e902e69516f82158203674d4951a40c82d4 (previously running with
>>> _only_ my alignment fixup in efidisk.c). Same behaviour.
>>
>> I cannot reproduce it on x86_64 (also with mm-debug enabled) and I do
>> not know how to load standalone image on ppc; is it possible to use QEMU
>> to run ARM64 (I assume you have it)? If not what are options to test it?
>>
>> Anyway, there was one problem I fixed later (although I did not get any
>> issue before as well), I attach updated version. Thank you for testing!
>
> I can confirm that:
> 1) The first patch exhibits no bad behaviour on QEMU [1].
> 2) The second patch exhibits no bad behaviour on either QEMU nor HW.
>
> This still generates fixups in efidisk for each call though.
Of course; it was intended to add framework for direct-to-cache IO, it
did not change alignment.
> Could I rework my disk->malloc patch on top of this for 2.02 release?
>
Of course! Not sure whether it is 2.02 material though, but we can keep
it in next then. Hopefully 2.03 won't take so long :)
> /
> Leif
>
> [1] qemu-system-aarch64 -m 1024 -cpu cortex-a57 -M virt -bios
> QEMU_EFI.fd -nographic -hda fat:fat/
> With QEMU_EFI.fd from
> http://releases.linaro.org/components/kernel/uefi-linaro/16.02/debug/qemu64/
> And fat/ being a directory holding the image generated with grub-mkstandalone.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Grub-devel mailing list
> Grub-devel@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-01 19:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-19 16:18 [PATCH 0/2] Alternative efidisk alignment resolution Leif Lindholm
2016-02-19 16:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] disk: Add support for device-specific malloc function Leif Lindholm
2016-02-22 7:57 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2016-02-22 14:02 ` Leif Lindholm
2016-02-22 16:56 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2016-02-24 11:59 ` Leif Lindholm
2016-02-24 12:09 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2016-02-24 13:57 ` Leif Lindholm
2016-02-24 17:40 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2016-02-24 19:04 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2016-02-26 13:27 ` Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
2016-02-26 13:48 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2016-02-26 13:52 ` Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
2016-03-01 17:11 ` Leif Lindholm
2016-03-01 19:46 ` Andrei Borzenkov [this message]
2016-03-01 20:19 ` Leif Lindholm
2016-02-22 16:57 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2016-02-22 16:59 ` Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
2016-02-19 16:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] efidisk: respect block_io_protocol minimum buffer alignment Leif Lindholm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56D5F188.6010306@gmail.com \
--to=arvidjaar@gmail.com \
--cc=grub-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).