From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1ad2iS-0000CO-GS for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 16:29:24 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32922) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ad2iQ-0000BA-0L for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 16:29:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ad2iM-00066h-0k for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 16:29:21 -0500 Received: from mail-lb0-x22a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::22a]:36704) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ad2iL-00066Q-M3 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 16:29:17 -0500 Received: by mail-lb0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id x1so146465200lbj.3 for ; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 13:29:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BkCI+NQhrgPHF4Hkj2GaOprv/qBJ0wK91Yx79afgcaI=; b=fJz8A+EkRfKdKzjgWQ6JYySzif9g2T8zGRmaHIcuEnwncnvNt9L9KBsfHHOJ1ET/Vw Ds5z9wMRzpdQxLEfEuYhB1iYLoDAqluybwwnNi1JpGJTu0E/k/BBO4plIj0OCc/zBUtC sJ26TcbtFjQFTMHtRbucgbZl9HZDJWqfDEWn3KZ03CKSIwewwE92/ziEj30WkrfrLpYo g8roCAyyVXo1cwMMoBAlqHMpmFbjri1KgSv+9eG4By0x8pyRG9YhJ+GSmn6q/EiyHoTS Wtntp1qxt+pYviJcMlOA8HXMapmeXdeSD2SB35lQtpSBRbb0aby+LbG47jMmmU9mkbbA Hk1g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BkCI+NQhrgPHF4Hkj2GaOprv/qBJ0wK91Yx79afgcaI=; b=KHZcKSu7wxWNJjLucsvB6Xj/eUbhVZxOOsoRD72i6G0kdC1TlV+RxpDrCSu3Vs2ryr iaOzXNSrHqzT6TlOxFZz+QvitCKKhl8OigEJBDRKj/gMFcjEWdv+H9Z7fzA/DCMLJKtz 1UFk9ef75urqrYf3ttVHpFVHD8fcGe24zd7SCdTNkLiHDoWMRIoDCf4iPnKdVTOH4Cah GBsHlIfMj0p3v3WBZqjVzUkvEjhr+NYz4RBYxS52q6yQ6TSQsoSWPpmQ3VmcLJ0o1wdV QEJb4g7rRi2GtGl10MyAyVb/hxDGx2AVhJtvmpBCx0F6xm+au1A+Ubqa9sxfEhoFXrtQ iRHw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKoTu3OV0+iSLVZ9Ss6Ga56FaWT9TVPxsrGZGQ2KPXQC3kZMyKpxp9QOTdZ4M84Uw== X-Received: by 10.112.25.99 with SMTP id b3mr7912754lbg.11.1457386156841; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 13:29:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.42] (ppp109-252-76-159.pppoe.spdop.ru. [109.252.76.159]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y184sm3104343lfd.16.2016.03.07.13.29.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 07 Mar 2016 13:29:15 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1] To: Peter Jones References: <20160304200641.GC27106@redhat.com> <56DA9AE8.3010006@gmail.com> <20160307190016.GA13163@redhat.com> <56DDE5B0.6080002@gmail.com> <56DDEB3D.4010505@gmail.com> <20160307211958.GF13163@redhat.com> From: Andrei Borzenkov Message-ID: <56DDF2AA.3010504@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 00:29:14 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160307211958.GF13163@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c04::22a Cc: Matt Fleming , Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko , Colin Watson , The development of GRUB 2 X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 21:29:22 -0000 08.03.2016 00:20, Peter Jones пишет: > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:57:33PM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: >> >>> How big part of it is related to secure boot? Just >>> changing Linux boot protocol doesn't need FSF involvement. Accepting secure >> >> Patches currently use EFI stub to launch kernel but I think this is done >> simply to make code easier. We can continue to use the same load >> protocol as before, just add image verification. > > No, they're doing it because that is the supported entry point for EFI > in Linux. We do not want EFI machines using other entry points. It > worked out terribly when we used to do this, and we don't want to start > again. I've Cc'd Matt Fleming, the upstream kernel EFI maintainer, > because I'm sure he's going to agree with me. > So you mean that linux loader is currently broken on EFI?