Grub Development Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viswesh S <viswesh_vichu@yahoo.com>
To: The development of GRUB 2 <grub-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Linking
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 07:33:41 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <694347.9013.qm@web31608.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2083 bytes --]

Suppose I am adding a new command,so should I create a new file for that command and modify only the command,rmk accordingly?
All the other files get autogenerated by autogen.sh ?
Is this sufficient ?
Viswesh



----- Original Message ----
From: Colin D Bennett <colin@gibibit.com>
To: grub-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, 25 July, 2008 7:31:28 PM
Subject: Re: Linking

On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 03:22:57 -0700 (PDT)
Viswesh S <viswesh_vichu@yahoo.com> wrote:

> The reason for hello to be put in a directory because it is a module
> and not a simple command.Understood myself

Actually, no.  Every C source file in the 'commands' directory is
currently a module itself.

I think the reason that 'hello.mod' is separated out is to make it
easier to see that there is only one source file as part of 'hello.mod'.

Regards,
Colin


> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Viswesh S <viswesh_vichu@yahoo.com>
> To: The development of GRUB 2 <grub-devel@gnu.org>
> Sent: Friday, 25 July, 2008 3:44:48 PM
> Subject: Re: Linking
> 
> 
> Hi,
>  
> So if I add a module or add a new command,which are the files which I
> should modify in general and which all gets generated automatically. 
> Is this somewhere documented ?
>  
> Why is it that hello command is put in a separate directory, while
> lspci is put inside the commands directory. 
> Is there a specific reason for this.
>  
>  
> Viswesh
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
> To: grub-devel@gnu.org
> Sent: Friday, 25 July, 2008 11:59:21 AM
> Subject: Re: Linking
> 
> Quoting Viswesh S <viswesh_vichu@yahoo.com>:
> 
> > Hi Pavel,
> > Could you please attach the modified file ?
> > Viswesh
> 
> No, I'm just giving you an idea what you may be doing wrong.
> 


_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel



      Share files, take polls, and make new friends - all under one roof. Go to http://in.promos.yahoo.com/groups/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3546 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2008-07-25 14:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-25 14:33 Viswesh S [this message]
2008-07-25 15:12 ` Linking Colin D Bennett
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-07-25 10:22 Linking Viswesh S
2008-07-25 14:01 ` Linking Colin D Bennett
2008-07-25 10:14 Linking Viswesh S
2008-07-25  6:06 Linking Viswesh S
2008-07-25  6:29 ` Linking Pavel Roskin
2008-07-25  5:17 Linking Viswesh S
2008-07-25  5:35 ` Linking Pavel Roskin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=694347.9013.qm@web31608.mail.mud.yahoo.com \
    --to=viswesh_vichu@yahoo.com \
    --cc=grub-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox