From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1VYfim-00046V-3q for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 13:26:20 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52158) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VYfe3-00023U-HW for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 13:21:32 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VYfdz-0007n3-2j for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 13:21:27 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:59102) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VYfdy-0007mi-BG for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 13:21:23 -0400 Received: from azsmga001.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.19]) by azsmga101.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Oct 2013 10:21:16 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,535,1378882800"; d="scan'208";a="378411515" Received: from fmsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.19.9.35]) by azsmga001.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Oct 2013 10:21:15 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx105.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.249]) by FMSMSX104.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.240]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 10:21:15 -0700 From: "Maliszewski, Richard L" To: Daniel Kiper Subject: Re: EFI and multiboot2 devlopment work for Xen Thread-Topic: EFI and multiboot2 devlopment work for Xen Thread-Index: AQHOzl01U2QqStCwI06ZIUY46NKV8Zn/osgAgABUwACAAPKqAIAAAVgAgAAD9ICAAAPwgIAAPmUAgAAQ2ICAAAvggIAAAgsAgAACuACAAAVUAIAABkaA//+N9YCAAHm2AP//kuoA Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 17:21:15 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20131022165140.GL3626@debian70-amd64.local.net-space.pl> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.8.130913 x-originating-ip: [10.252.138.123] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-7" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 143.182.124.21 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 13:26:18 -0400 Cc: Matthew Garrett , "keir@xen.org" , Ian Campbell , The development of GNU GRUB , =?iso-8859-7?Q?Vladimir_=27=F6-coder/phcoder=27_Serbinenko?= , "stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" , Jan Beulich , "ross.philipson@citrix.com" , "boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com" , "Woodhouse, David" X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 17:21:32 -0000 The latter. The code I was looking at definitely has the linuxefi directive. FWIW, if you install FC18/19 on an EFI system, the grub2 config file uses the linuxefi and companion initrd directives for launch. --Richard On 10/22/13 9:51 AM, "Daniel Kiper" wrote: >On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 04:36:04PM +0000, Maliszewski, Richard L wrote: >> I may be off-base, but when I was wading through the grub2 code earlier >> this year, it looked to me like it was going to refuse to launch >>anything >> via MB1 or MB2 if the current state was a secure boot launch. > >Are you talking about upstream GRUB2 or GRUB2 with tons of distros >patches including linuxefi one. If later one it could be the case. > >Daniel