From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1decGH-0003iU-TQ for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Aug 2017 03:15:37 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36492) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1decGF-0003fZ-D4 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Aug 2017 03:15:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1decGB-00077G-QM for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Aug 2017 03:15:35 -0400 Received: from smtp1.signet.nl ([83.96.147.43]:56578) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1decGB-0006sl-Ib for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Aug 2017 03:15:31 -0400 Received: from webmail.dds.nl (app2.dds.nl [81.21.136.118]) by smtp1.signet.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3F3D18CE3 for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 09:15:05 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2017 09:15:05 +0200 From: Xen To: grub-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: grub2-probe confused by double bind mount? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: X-Sender: list@xenhideout.nl User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.4 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 83.96.147.43 X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2017 07:15:36 -0000 Chris Murphy schreef op 07-08-2017 8:56: > The non-working case looks like it starts failing after line 213, > openat /proc/self/mountinfo as if whatever it finds there is not at > all helpful. The only similar thing I ever experienced is when my system inside a chroot actually had a line filtering out a certain volume group or physical volume for LVM, thereby mysteriously causing a command to fail inside the chroot but not outside of it ;-). Probably not helpful, but I thought I'd mention.