From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <igt-dev-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [134.134.136.65])
 by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4695F10E18B
 for <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 17:43:21 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <02745fcb-a336-e2dd-d85d-3a3aed7d97d1@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 23:12:57 +0530
Content-Language: en-US
To: Karthik B S <karthik.b.s@intel.com>, <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
References: <20230629144910.3055377-1-bhanuprakash.modem@intel.com>
 <20230629144910.3055377-20-bhanuprakash.modem@intel.com>
 <4cbf748f-30b7-7d8d-0d8f-148576a4dbda@intel.com>
From: "Modem, Bhanuprakash" <bhanuprakash.modem@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <4cbf748f-30b7-7d8d-0d8f-148576a4dbda@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [V5 i-g-t 19/81] tests/i915/kms_fence_pin_leak:
 Document each subtest for testplan
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/igt-dev>,
 <mailto:igt-dev-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/igt-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:igt-dev-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev>,
 <mailto:igt-dev-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: igt-dev-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
Sender: "igt-dev" <igt-dev-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-ID: <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>

Hi Karthik,

On Wed-09-08-2023 02:50 pm, Karthik B S wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 6/29/2023 8:18 PM, Bhanuprakash Modem wrote:
>> Add documentation for all kms tests which is used by IGT testplan
>> documentation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bhanuprakash Modem <bhanuprakash.modem@intel.com>
>> ---
>>   tests/i915/kms_fence_pin_leak.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/i915/kms_fence_pin_leak.c 
>> b/tests/i915/kms_fence_pin_leak.c
>> index 3d63acfef..0321aa3cb 100644
>> --- a/tests/i915/kms_fence_pin_leak.c
>> +++ b/tests/i915/kms_fence_pin_leak.c
>> @@ -30,6 +30,19 @@
>>   #include "i915/gem.h"
>>   #include "igt.h"
>> +/**
>> + * TEST: kms fence pin leak
>> + * Category: Display
>> + * Description: Exercises full ppgtt fence pin_count leak in the kernel.
> 
> This test actually has no subtest defined. Do we need duplicate 
> definitions in this case?

Purpose of these two descriptions are different (One is for overall test 
& another is for each subtest).

Please try to check using these two methods, you can understand:

./scripts/igt_doc.py --config=tests/kms_test_config.json 
--filter-field=Functionality=~'kms_core, synchronization'

./scripts/igt_doc.py --config=tests/kms_test_config.json 
--filter-field=Functionality=~'kms_core, synchronization' --per-test

- Bhanu

> 
> Thanks,
> Karthik.B.S
> 
>> + *
>> + * SUBTEST:
>> + * Description: Exercises full ppgtt fence pin_count leak in the kernel.
>> + * Driver requirement: i915
>> + * Functionality: kms_core, synchronization
>> + * Mega feature: General Display Features
>> + * Run type: FULL
>> + * Test category: functionality test
>> + */
>>   IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Exercises full ppgtt fence pin_count leak in 
>> the "
>>                "kernel.");