From: "Reddy Guddati, Santhosh" <santhosh.reddy.guddati@intel.com>
To: Jeevan B <jeevan.b@intel.com>, <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_display_modes: Fit modes within MST bandwidth constraints
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 14:42:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <070d3642-31e8-4f72-86e7-8c33fdb13a4f@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250403105335.2034060-1-jeevan.b@intel.com>
Hi Jeevan,
On 03-04-2025 16:23, Jeevan B wrote:
> Instead of checking only the current modes, find a combination of
> modes in the MST topology that can be accommodated within the
> available link bandwidth.
>
> v2: move fit_modes_in_bw to lib/igt_kms
> v3: update tag from fixes to closes
>
> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/1542
> Signed-off-by: Jeevan B <jeevan.b@intel.com>
> ---
> lib/igt_kms.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> lib/igt_kms.h | 1 +
> tests/intel/kms_dp_link_training.c | 24 +-----------------------
> tests/intel/kms_dp_linktrain_fallback.c | 18 +-----------------
> tests/kms_display_modes.c | 4 ++++
> 5 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/igt_kms.c b/lib/igt_kms.c
> index 99c8707c7..f8274f49a 100644
> --- a/lib/igt_kms.c
> +++ b/lib/igt_kms.c
> @@ -5046,6 +5046,30 @@ bool igt_override_all_active_output_modes_to_fit_bw(igt_display_t *display)
> return __override_all_active_output_modes_to_fit_bw(display, outputs, n_outputs, 0);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * fit_modes_in_bw :
> + * @display: a pointer to an #igt_display_t structure
> + *
> + * Tries atomic TEST_ONLY commit; if it fails, overrides
> + * output modes to fit bandwidth.
> + */
> +bool fit_modes_in_bw(igt_display_t *display)
> +{
> + bool found;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = igt_display_try_commit_atomic(display,
> + DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_TEST_ONLY |
> + DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_ALLOW_MODESET, NULL);
> + if (ret != 0) {
> + found = igt_override_all_active_output_modes_to_fit_bw(display);
> + igt_require_f(found,
> + "No valid mode combo found for modeset\n");
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * igt_pipe_refresh:
> * @display: a pointer to an #igt_display_t structure
> diff --git a/lib/igt_kms.h b/lib/igt_kms.h
> index 0381c82ad..fe01eaf3f 100644
> --- a/lib/igt_kms.h
> +++ b/lib/igt_kms.h
> @@ -1226,6 +1226,7 @@ void igt_require_pipe(igt_display_t *display,
> void igt_dump_connectors_fd(int drmfd);
> void igt_dump_crtcs_fd(int drmfd);
> bool igt_override_all_active_output_modes_to_fit_bw(igt_display_t *display);
> +bool fit_modes_in_bw(igt_display_t *display);
> bool igt_get_i915_edp_lobf_status(int drmfd, char *connector_name);
> unsigned int igt_get_output_max_bpc(int drmfd, char *connector_name);
> unsigned int igt_get_pipe_current_bpc(int drmfd, enum pipe pipe);
> diff --git a/tests/intel/kms_dp_link_training.c b/tests/intel/kms_dp_link_training.c
> index 9e9b1e6db..9b6248c6f 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/kms_dp_link_training.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/kms_dp_link_training.c
> @@ -140,28 +140,6 @@ static void setup_planes_fbs(data_t *data, igt_output_t *outs[],
> }
> }
>
> -/*
> - * fit_modes_in_bw - Tries atomic TEST_ONLY commit; if it fails, overrides
> - * output modes to fit bandwidth.
> - */
> -static bool fit_modes_in_bw(data_t *data)
> -{
> - int ret;
> -
> - ret = igt_display_try_commit_atomic(&data->display,
> - DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_TEST_ONLY |
> - DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_ALLOW_MODESET,
> - NULL);
> - if (ret != 0) {
> - bool found;
> -
> - found = igt_override_all_active_output_modes_to_fit_bw(&data->display);
> - igt_require_f(found, "No valid mode combo found for modeset\n");
> - }
> -
> - return true;
> -}
> -
> static void do_modeset(data_t *data, bool mst)
> {
> uint32_t master_pipes_mask = 0;
> @@ -204,7 +182,7 @@ static void do_modeset(data_t *data, bool mst)
> "Unable to assign pipes for outputs\n");
>
> setup_planes_fbs(data, outs, out_count, modes, fbs, planes);
> - fit_modes_in_bw(data);
> + fit_modes_in_bw(&data->display);
> igt_display_commit2(&data->display, COMMIT_ATOMIC);
> }
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/kms_dp_linktrain_fallback.c b/tests/intel/kms_dp_linktrain_fallback.c
> index 6a872efd2..64f21ec6f 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/kms_dp_linktrain_fallback.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/kms_dp_linktrain_fallback.c
> @@ -151,22 +151,6 @@ static void set_connector_link_status_good(data_t *data, igt_output_t *outputs[]
> DRM_MODE_LINK_STATUS_GOOD);
> }
>
> -static bool fit_modes_in_bw(data_t *data)
> -{
> - bool found;
> - int ret;
> -
> - ret = igt_display_try_commit_atomic(&data->display,
> - DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_TEST_ONLY |
> - DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_ALLOW_MODESET, NULL);
> - if (ret != 0) {
> - found = igt_override_all_active_output_modes_to_fit_bw(&data->display);
> - igt_require_f(found,
> - "No valid mode combo found for modeset\n");
> - }
> - return true;
> -}
> -
> static bool validate_modeset_for_outputs(data_t *data,
> igt_output_t *outputs[],
> int *output_count,
> @@ -176,7 +160,7 @@ static bool validate_modeset_for_outputs(data_t *data,
> {
> igt_require_f(*output_count > 0, "Require at least 1 output\n");
> setup_pipe_on_outputs(data, outputs, output_count);
> - igt_assert_f(fit_modes_in_bw(data), "Unable to fit modes in bw\n");
> + igt_assert_f(fit_modes_in_bw(&data->display), "Unable to fit modes in bw\n");
The function fit_modes_in_bw causes the test to skip if valid modes is
not found, but here we are intending to assert the test. Are both
contradicting?
> setup_modeset_on_outputs(data, outputs,
> output_count,
> mode, fb, primary);
> diff --git a/tests/kms_display_modes.c b/tests/kms_display_modes.c
> index 588820170..f2bbfafe2 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_display_modes.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_display_modes.c
> @@ -93,6 +93,8 @@ static void run_extendedmode_basic(data_t *data,
> mode[0] = igt_output_get_mode(output1);
> mode[1] = igt_output_get_mode(output2);
>
> + igt_assert(fit_modes_in_bw(display));
> +
> pipe_crc[0] = igt_pipe_crc_new(data->drm_fd, pipe1, IGT_PIPE_CRC_SOURCE_AUTO);
> pipe_crc[1] = igt_pipe_crc_new(data->drm_fd, pipe2, IGT_PIPE_CRC_SOURCE_AUTO);
>
> @@ -138,6 +140,7 @@ static void run_extendedmode_basic(data_t *data,
> igt_fb_set_size(&fb, plane[1], mode[1]->hdisplay, mode[1]->vdisplay);
> igt_plane_set_size(plane[1], mode[1]->hdisplay, mode[1]->vdisplay);
>
> + igt_assert(fit_modes_in_bw(display));
> igt_display_commit2(display, COMMIT_ATOMIC);
>
> igt_pipe_crc_collect_crc(pipe_crc[0], &crc[0]);
> @@ -158,6 +161,7 @@ static void run_extendedmode_basic(data_t *data,
> DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY), NULL);
> igt_plane_set_fb(igt_pipe_get_plane_type(&display->pipes[pipe2],
> DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY), NULL);
> + igt_assert(fit_modes_in_bw(display));
> igt_display_commit2(display, COMMIT_ATOMIC);
>
> /*Compare CRC*/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-04 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-03 10:53 [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_display_modes: Fit modes within MST bandwidth constraints Jeevan B
2025-04-03 18:23 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for tests/kms_display_modes: Fit modes within MST bandwidth constraints (rev3) Patchwork
2025-04-03 18:39 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-04-03 21:42 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-04-03 23:33 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2025-04-04 9:12 ` Reddy Guddati, Santhosh [this message]
2025-04-10 7:25 ` [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_display_modes: Fit modes within MST bandwidth constraints B, Jeevan
2025-04-04 16:15 ` Thasleem, Mohammed
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-05-05 16:12 Jeevan B
2025-05-06 8:30 ` Thasleem, Mohammed
2025-04-30 9:46 Jeevan B
2025-05-05 4:25 ` Reddy Guddati, Santhosh
2025-04-16 9:47 Jeevan B
2025-03-28 8:57 Jeevan B
2025-04-01 6:22 ` Sharma, Swati2
2025-03-24 9:44 Jeevan B
2025-03-25 7:56 ` Sharma, Swati2
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=070d3642-31e8-4f72-86e7-8c33fdb13a4f@intel.com \
--to=santhosh.reddy.guddati@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jeevan.b@intel.com \
--cc=swati2.sharma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox