From: Karthik B S <karthik.b.s@intel.com>
To: "Joshi, Kunal1" <kunal1.joshi@intel.com>,
<igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Jason-JH Lin <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_bw: Allow custom modes for external panels
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 08:54:27 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <079b3f19-c245-4af1-ad91-167142d731c2@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cfb390ca-3f9f-4423-882b-d2e0661b9151@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8167 bytes --]
Hi Kunal,
On 4/14/2026 6:14 PM, Joshi, Kunal1 wrote:
>
> Hello Karthik,
>
> On 07-04-2026 15:22, Karthik B S wrote:
>> Currently the test is rejecting all the outputs where the mode is not
>> matching. This is leading to excessive skips on configs wherer the tests
>> were passing previouly.
>>
>> Instead of this, use default mode for fixed mode panels if the required
>> custom mode is not found. And use custom mode for external panels as
>> these are allowed and have also been passing previously.
>>
>> Cc: Jason-JH Lin<jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com>
>> Cc: Kunal Joshi<kunal1.joshi@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Karthik B S<karthik.b.s@intel.com>
>> ---
>> tests/kms_bw.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/kms_bw.c b/tests/kms_bw.c
>> index 4df5c2cee..4a32ec811 100644
>> --- a/tests/kms_bw.c
>> +++ b/tests/kms_bw.c
>> @@ -186,14 +186,16 @@ static void force_output_mode(data_t *d, igt_output_t *output,
>> igt_output_override_mode(output, mode);
>> }
>>
>> -static bool output_mode_supported(igt_output_t *output, const drmModeModeInfo *mode)
>> +/* Check if output has a matching mode and call it out if mode is being forced */
>> +static void output_mode_supported(igt_output_t *output, const drmModeModeInfo *mode)
> Since the function is now void and purely informational, the name
> output_mode_supported no longer reflects what it does. Consider renaming
Thank you for the review.
Sure will update this.
>> {
>> drmModeConnector *connector = output->config.connector;
>> + drmModeModeInfo *default_mode;
>> int i;
>>
>> /* Virtual/forced sinks support all modes */
>> if (!igt_output_is_connected(output))
>> - return true;
>> + return;
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < connector->count_modes; i++) {
>> drmModeModeInfo *conn_mode = &connector->modes[i];
>> @@ -204,26 +206,32 @@ static bool output_mode_supported(igt_output_t *output, const drmModeModeInfo *m
>> igt_debug("Found matching mode for %dx%d@%dHz on %s\n",
>> mode->hdisplay, mode->vdisplay, mode->vrefresh,
>> igt_output_name(output));
>> - return true;
>> }
>> }
>>
>> - igt_info("Mode %dx%d@%dHz not supported by %s (has %d modes)\n",
>> - mode->hdisplay, mode->vdisplay, mode->vrefresh,
>> - igt_output_name(output), connector->count_modes);
>> -
>> - return false;
>> + if (output_is_internal_panel(output)) {
>> + default_mode = igt_output_get_mode(output);
>> + igt_info("Mode %dx%d@%dHz not supported by %s (has %d modes).\n"
>> + "%s Default mode: %dx%d@%dHz\n",
>> + mode->hdisplay, mode->vdisplay, mode->vrefresh,
>> + igt_output_name(output), connector->count_modes, igt_output_name(output),
>> + default_mode->hdisplay, default_mode->vdisplay, default_mode->vrefresh);
>> + } else {
>> + igt_info("Mode %dx%d@%dHz not supported by %s (has %d modes). Forcing mode.\n",
>> + mode->hdisplay, mode->vdisplay, mode->vrefresh,
>> + igt_output_name(output), connector->count_modes);
>> + }
> Previously the matching case returned immediately from inside the loop.
> If that early return is removed without adding equivalent control flow,
> then when a matching mode /is/found the function will still fall through
> and print the "not supported" message afterward. In that case we would end
> up logging both "Found matching mode" and "not supported" for the same
> connector/mode pair.
Will fix this.
>> }
>>
>> static void run_test_linear_tiling(data_t *data, int n_crtcs, const drmModeModeInfo *mode, bool physical) {
>> igt_display_t *display = &data->display;
>> igt_output_t *output;
>> + drmModeModeInfo fb_mode;
>> struct igt_fb buffer[IGT_MAX_PIPES];
>> igt_crc_t zero, captured[IGT_MAX_PIPES];
>> int i = 0, num_pipes = 0;
>> igt_crtc_t *crtc;
>> int ret;
>> - bool has_supported_mode = false;
>>
>> /* Cannot use igt_display_n_crtcs() due to fused pipes on i915 where they do
>> * not give the numver of valid crtcs and always return IGT_MAX_PIPES */
>> @@ -242,14 +250,26 @@ static void run_test_linear_tiling(data_t *data, int n_crtcs, const drmModeModeI
>> crtc = data->crtc[i];
>>
>> output = physical ? data->connected_output[i] : data->output[i];
>> - if (!output || !output_mode_supported(output, mode)) {
>> + if (!output)
>> continue;
>> - }
>>
>> - force_output_mode(data, output, mode);
>> + output_mode_supported(output, mode);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * On fixed mode panels trying to force a custom mode can lead to failures or
>> + * implicit handling where the default mode is used even though custom mode is requested.
>> + * To avoid this use default mode on fixed mode panels and
>> + * use custom modes only on external panels.
>> + */
>> + if (output_is_internal_panel(output)) {
>> + fb_mode = *igt_output_get_mode(output);
>> + } else {
>> + force_output_mode(data, output, mode);
>> + fb_mode = *mode;
>> + }
> For internal panels, the subtest will always run at the panel's native
> mode
> regardless of what mode the subtest requested. So a subtest meant to
> stress
> e.g. 4K@60 bandwidth will actually run at whatever the native eDP
> resolution
> is. The test will pass but it won't be validating the bandwidth
> scenario the
> subtest name implies.
>
> For internal panels where the requested custom mode is not natively
> supported,
> instead of silently falling back to the default mode, skip that output
> for that
> specific subtest (also prefer external panel first to reduce skip's),
> since the bandwidth scenario cannot actually be exercised on that panel.
>
> I know we are doing this so we eventually have less skip's, but
> someone who won't
> know this fact may have false sense of coverage (i.e we tested 4x4k).
>
> Other alternative would be changing test description to state test
> exercise's standard
> modes on external panel with default mode internal if present. This
> scenario is more likely as user will
> have internal panel running along with some external display's connected.
This is something even I was contemplating on which direction to take.
But I leaned on using the fixed mode panel finally, as without that
we'll completely leave out one of the displays.
I will update the test description and also see if the test name can
also be updated to call this out more clearly.
Thanks and Regards,
Karthik.B.S
>
> Thanks and Regards
> Kunal Joshi
>>
>> - igt_create_color_fb(display->drm_fd, mode->hdisplay,
>> - mode->vdisplay, DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888,
>> + igt_create_color_fb(display->drm_fd, fb_mode.hdisplay,
>> + fb_mode.vdisplay, DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888,
>> DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR, 1.f, 0.f, 0.f,
>> &buffer[i]);
>>
>> @@ -258,10 +278,8 @@ static void run_test_linear_tiling(data_t *data, int n_crtcs, const drmModeModeI
>> igt_plane_set_fb(data->primary[i], &buffer[i]);
>> igt_info("Assigning pipe %s to output %s with mode %s\n",
>> igt_crtc_name(crtc), igt_output_name(output),
>> - mode->name);
>> - has_supported_mode = true;
>> + fb_mode.name);
>> }
>> - igt_skip_on_f(!has_supported_mode, "Unsupported mode for all pipes\n");
>>
>> ret = igt_display_try_commit_atomic(display,
>> DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_ALLOW_MODESET |
>> @@ -273,9 +291,8 @@ static void run_test_linear_tiling(data_t *data, int n_crtcs, const drmModeModeI
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < n_crtcs; i++) {
>> output = physical ? data->connected_output[i] : data->output[i];
>> - if (!output || !output_mode_supported(output, mode)) {
>> + if (!output)
>> continue;
>> - }
>>
>> igt_pipe_crc_collect_crc(data->pipe_crc[i], &captured[i]);
>> igt_assert_f(!igt_check_crc_equal(&zero, &captured[i]),
>> @@ -284,7 +301,7 @@ static void run_test_linear_tiling(data_t *data, int n_crtcs, const drmModeModeI
>>
>> for (i = n_crtcs - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
>> output = physical ? data->connected_output[i] : data->output[i];
>> - if (!output || !output_mode_supported(output, mode))
>> + if (!output)
>> continue;
>>
>> igt_remove_fb(display->drm_fd, &buffer[i]);
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 10269 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-16 3:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-07 9:52 [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_bw: Allow custom modes for external panels Karthik B S
2026-04-08 0:25 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2026-04-08 0:34 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2026-04-08 3:33 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
2026-04-08 7:28 ` [PATCH i-g-t] " Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥)
2026-04-09 8:57 ` Samala, Pranay
2026-04-14 4:41 ` Karthik B S
2026-04-14 12:44 ` Joshi, Kunal1
2026-04-16 3:24 ` Karthik B S [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=079b3f19-c245-4af1-ad91-167142d731c2@intel.com \
--to=karthik.b.s@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com \
--cc=kunal1.joshi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox