From: "Sharma, Nishit" <nishit.sharma@intel.com>
To: Jia Yao <jia.yao@intel.com>, <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>, Xin Wang <x.wang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] tests/intel/xe_exec_system_allocator: Expect UC PAT madvise rejection
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 22:03:23 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <091d8cce-d45a-43d9-8c19-00100389223d@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260422065412.406536-1-jia.yao@intel.com>
On 4/22/2026 12:24 PM, Jia Yao wrote:
> UC PAT index with CPU cached memory (system allocator) is now rejected
> by kernel to prevent security issues where GPU could bypass CPU cache
> and read stale sensitive data from DRAM.
>
> Modify UC PAT index tests to verify kernel correctly rejects the madvise
> call with -EINVAL, instead of attempting to execute batch buffers.
>
> v2(Xin Wang)
> - Put madvise rejection in a function
>
> v3:
> - Add multi-vma check in the function
>
> v4(Xin Wang)
> - Implement reject function inside test_exec
>
> v5(Xin Wang)
> - Some optimize
>
> v6:
> - wt is also judeged as coh_none inside kernel, need rejection too
>
> v7:
> - limited the change to iGPU only
>
> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> Cc: Nishit Sharma <nishit.sharma@intel.com>
> Cc: Xin Wang <x.wang@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jia Yao <jia.yao@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/intel/xe_exec_system_allocator.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_exec_system_allocator.c b/tests/intel/xe_exec_system_allocator.c
> index ee199dd15..5580099f7 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_exec_system_allocator.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_exec_system_allocator.c
> @@ -1216,7 +1216,7 @@ xe_vm_madvise_migrate_pages(int fd, uint32_t vm, uint64_t addr, uint64_t range)
> DRM_XE_MIGRATE_ALL_PAGES, 0);
> }
>
> -static void
> +static bool
> xe_vm_parse_execute_madvise(int fd, uint32_t vm, struct test_exec_data *data,
> size_t bo_size,
> struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci,
> @@ -1312,33 +1312,64 @@ xe_vm_parse_execute_madvise(int fd, uint32_t vm, struct test_exec_data *data,
> if (flags & MADVISE_PAT_INDEX) {
> uint32_t num_ranges;
> struct drm_xe_mem_range_attr *mem_attrs;
> + uint8_t pat_idx = pat_value(fd);
> + bool is_uc_pat = (pat_value == intel_get_pat_idx_wt ||
> + pat_value == intel_get_pat_idx_uc ||
> + pat_value == intel_get_pat_idx_uc_comp);
> + int err;
>
> if (bo_size)
> bo_size = ALIGN(bo_size, SZ_4K);
>
> + if (is_uc_pat && !xe_has_vram(fd)) {
> + /* UC PAT should be rejected by kernel for CPU cached memory (iGPU only) */
> + if (flags & MADVISE_MULTI_VMA) {
> + err = __xe_vm_madvise(fd, vm, to_user_pointer(data) + bo_size,
> + bo_size / 2, 0, DRM_XE_MEM_RANGE_ATTR_PAT,
> + pat_idx, 0, 0);
> + igt_assert_eq(err, -EINVAL);
> +
> + err = __xe_vm_madvise(fd, vm, to_user_pointer(data), bo_size,
> + 0, DRM_XE_MEM_RANGE_ATTR_PAT,
> + pat_idx, 0, 0);
> + igt_assert_eq(err, -EINVAL);
> +
> + err = __xe_vm_madvise(fd, vm, to_user_pointer(data) + bo_size / 2,
> + bo_size / 4, 0, DRM_XE_MEM_RANGE_ATTR_PAT,
> + pat_idx, 0, 0);
> + igt_assert_eq(err, -EINVAL);
> + } else {
> + err = __xe_vm_madvise(fd, vm, to_user_pointer(data), bo_size,
> + 0, DRM_XE_MEM_RANGE_ATTR_PAT, pat_idx, 0, 0);
> + igt_assert_eq(err, -EINVAL);
> + }
> + return true; /* Skip exec for UC PAT tests on iGPU */
> + }
> +
> if (flags & MADVISE_MULTI_VMA) {
> xe_vm_madvixe_pat_attr(fd, vm, to_user_pointer(data) + bo_size,
> - bo_size / 2, pat_value(fd));
> + bo_size / 2, pat_idx);
> xe_vm_madvixe_pat_attr(fd, vm, to_user_pointer(data), bo_size,
> - pat_value(fd));
> + pat_idx);
> xe_vm_madvixe_pat_attr(fd, vm, to_user_pointer(data) + bo_size / 2,
> - bo_size / 4, pat_value(fd));
> + bo_size / 4, pat_idx);
> } else {
> xe_vm_madvixe_pat_attr(fd, vm, to_user_pointer(data), bo_size,
> - pat_value(fd));
> + pat_idx);
> }
>
> mem_attrs = xe_vm_get_mem_attr_values_in_range(fd, vm, addr, bo_size, &num_ranges);
> if (!mem_attrs) {
> igt_debug("Failed to get memory attributes\n");
> - return;
> + return false;
> }
>
> for (uint32_t i = 0; i < num_ranges; i++)
> - igt_assert_eq_u32(mem_attrs[i].pat_index.val, pat_value(fd));
> + igt_assert_eq_u32(mem_attrs[i].pat_index.val, pat_idx);
>
> free(mem_attrs);
> }
> + return false;
> }
>
> static void
> @@ -1560,8 +1591,9 @@ test_exec(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci,
> addr = to_user_pointer(data);
>
> if (flags & MADVISE_OP)
> - xe_vm_parse_execute_madvise(fd, vm, data, bo_size, eci, addr, flags, sync,
> - pat_value);
> + if (xe_vm_parse_execute_madvise(fd, vm, data, bo_size, eci, addr, flags, sync,
> + pat_value))
> + goto cleanup;
>
> if (flags & BO_UNMAP) {
> bo_flags = DRM_XE_GEM_CREATE_FLAG_NEEDS_VISIBLE_VRAM;
> @@ -1971,8 +2003,11 @@ cleanup:
> gem_close(fd, bo);
> }
>
> - munmap(bind_ufence, SZ_4K);
> - gem_close(fd, bind_sync);
> + if (bind_ufence)
> + munmap(bind_ufence, SZ_4K);
> +
> + if (bind_sync)
> + gem_close(fd, bind_sync);
>
> if (flags & BUSY)
> igt_assert_eq(unbind_system_allocator(), -EBUSY);
LGTM:
Reviewed-by: Nishit Sharma <nishit.sharma@intel.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-22 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-22 6:54 [PATCH v7] tests/intel/xe_exec_system_allocator: Expect UC PAT madvise rejection Jia Yao
2026-04-22 8:31 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for tests/intel/xe_exec_system_allocator: Expect UC PAT madvise rejection (rev7) Patchwork
2026-04-22 9:05 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-04-22 11:58 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-04-22 15:48 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2026-04-22 16:33 ` Sharma, Nishit [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=091d8cce-d45a-43d9-8c19-00100389223d@intel.com \
--to=nishit.sharma@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jia.yao@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=x.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox