From: "Grzegorzek, Dominik" <dominik.grzegorzek@intel.com>
To: "Kempczynski, Zbigniew" <zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com>,
"igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org" <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] tests/xe_gpgpu_fill: Add width/height/x/y command line args
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 13:36:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0fd2b463db40d47c60b64661b3a9a328d04153ad.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241114120616.70229-3-zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com>
On Thu, 2024-11-14 at 13:06 +0100, Zbigniew Kempczyński wrote:
> I've noticed shaders/pipelines have limitation to work on 16B
> boundaries (due to SIMD16). So to play with different surface sizes
> and offsets add W/H/X/Y switches.
>
> There's no problem at all not all sizes/offsets are supported as we
> would like to have, we use gpgpu fill to verify compute workload so
> if we won't notice gpu hang that's fine.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zbigniew Kempczyński <zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com>
> Cc: Dominik Grzegorzek <dominik.grzegorzek@intel.com>
Again it might be useful for testing any future gpgpu_fill implementations.
Reviewed-by: Dominik Grzegorzek <dominik.grzegorzek@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/intel/xe_gpgpu_fill.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_gpgpu_fill.c b/tests/intel/xe_gpgpu_fill.c
> index 4e1785432b..82625bb7c0 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_gpgpu_fill.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_gpgpu_fill.c
> @@ -40,6 +40,10 @@
> #define COLOR_4C 0x4c
>
> static bool dump_surface;
> +static uint32_t surfwidth = WIDTH;
> +static uint32_t surfheight = HEIGHT;
> +static uint32_t start_x;
> +static uint32_t start_y;
>
> typedef struct {
> int drm_fd;
> @@ -70,11 +74,11 @@ create_buf(data_t *data, int width, int height, uint8_t color, uint64_t region)
> return buf;
> }
>
> -static void buf_check(uint8_t *ptr, int x, int y, uint8_t color)
> +static void buf_check(uint8_t *ptr, int width, int x, int y, uint8_t color)
> {
> uint8_t val;
>
> - val = ptr[y * WIDTH + x];
> + val = ptr[y * width + x];
> igt_assert_f(val == color,
> "Expected 0x%02x, found 0x%02x at (%d,%d)\n",
> color, val, x, y);
> @@ -85,26 +89,29 @@ static void buf_check(uint8_t *ptr, int x, int y, uint8_t color)
> * Description: run gpgpu fill
> */
>
> -static void gpgpu_fill(data_t *data, igt_fillfunc_t fill, uint32_t region)
> +static void gpgpu_fill(data_t *data, igt_fillfunc_t fill, uint32_t region,
> + uint32_t surf_width, uint32_t surf_height,
> + uint32_t x, uint32_t y,
> + uint32_t width, uint32_t height)
> {
> struct intel_buf *buf;
> uint8_t *ptr;
> int i, j;
>
> - buf = create_buf(data, WIDTH, HEIGHT, COLOR_88, region);
> + buf = create_buf(data, surf_width, surf_height, COLOR_88, region);
> ptr = xe_bo_map(data->drm_fd, buf->handle, buf->surface[0].size);
>
> - for (i = 0; i < WIDTH; i++)
> - for (j = 0; j < HEIGHT; j++)
> - buf_check(ptr, i, j, COLOR_88);
> + for (i = 0; i < surf_width; i++)
> + for (j = 0; j < surf_height; j++)
> + buf_check(ptr, surf_width, i, j, COLOR_88);
>
> - fill(data->drm_fd, buf, 0, 0, WIDTH / 2, HEIGHT / 2, COLOR_4C);
> + fill(data->drm_fd, buf, x, y, width, height, COLOR_4C);
>
> if (dump_surface) {
> - for (j = 0; j < HEIGHT; j++) {
> + for (j = 0; j < surf_height; j++) {
> igt_info("[%04x] ", j);
> - for (i = 0; i < WIDTH; i++) {
> - igt_info("%02x", ptr[j * HEIGHT + i]);
> + for (i = 0; i < surf_width; i++) {
> + igt_info("%02x", ptr[j * surf_height + i]);
> if (i % 4 == 3)
> igt_info(" ");
> }
> @@ -112,12 +119,13 @@ static void gpgpu_fill(data_t *data, igt_fillfunc_t fill, uint32_t region)
> }
> }
>
> - for (i = 0; i < WIDTH; i++)
> - for (j = 0; j < HEIGHT; j++)
> - if (i < WIDTH / 2 && j < HEIGHT / 2)
> - buf_check(ptr, i, j, COLOR_4C);
> + for (i = 0; i < surf_width; i++)
> + for (j = 0; j < surf_height; j++)
> + if (i >= x && i < width + x &&
> + j >= y && j < height + y)
> + buf_check(ptr, surf_width, i, j, COLOR_4C);
> else
> - buf_check(ptr, i, j, COLOR_88);
> + buf_check(ptr, surf_height, i, j, COLOR_88);
>
> munmap(ptr, buf->surface[0].size);
> }
> @@ -128,6 +136,18 @@ static int opt_handler(int opt, int opt_index, void *data)
> case 'd':
> dump_surface = true;
> break;
> + case 'W':
> + surfwidth = atoi(optarg);
> + break;
> + case 'H':
> + surfheight = atoi(optarg);
> + break;
> + case 'X':
> + start_x = atoi(optarg);
> + break;
> + case 'Y':
> + start_y = atoi(optarg);
> + break;
> default:
> return IGT_OPT_HANDLER_ERROR;
> }
> @@ -138,10 +158,14 @@ static int opt_handler(int opt, int opt_index, void *data)
>
> const char *help_str =
> " -d\tDump surface\n"
> + " -W\tWidth (default 64)\n"
> + " -H\tHeight (default 64)\n"
> + " -X\tX start (aligned to 4)\n"
> + " -Y\tY start (aligned to 1)\n"
> ;
>
>
> -igt_main_args("d", NULL, help_str, opt_handler, NULL)
> +igt_main_args("dW:H:X:Y:", NULL, help_str, opt_handler, NULL)
> {
> data_t data = {0, };
> igt_fillfunc_t fill_fn = NULL;
> @@ -153,10 +177,16 @@ igt_main_args("d", NULL, help_str, opt_handler, NULL)
>
> fill_fn = igt_get_gpgpu_fillfunc(data.devid);
> igt_require_f(fill_fn, "no gpgpu-fill function\n");
> +
> + start_x = ALIGN(start_x, 4);
> }
>
> igt_subtest("basic") {
> - gpgpu_fill(&data, fill_fn, 0);
> + gpgpu_fill(&data, fill_fn, 0,
> + surfwidth, surfheight,
> + start_x, start_y,
> + surfwidth / 2,
> + surfheight / 2);
> }
>
> igt_fixture {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-14 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-14 12:06 [PATCH i-g-t 0/3] GPGPU fill improvements Zbigniew Kempczyński
2024-11-14 12:06 ` [PATCH i-g-t 1/3] tests/xe_gpgpu_fill: Add command line switch to dump the surface Zbigniew Kempczyński
2024-11-14 13:33 ` Grzegorzek, Dominik
2024-11-14 12:06 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] tests/xe_gpgpu_fill: Add width/height/x/y command line args Zbigniew Kempczyński
2024-11-14 13:36 ` Grzegorzek, Dominik [this message]
2024-11-14 12:06 ` [PATCH i-g-t 3/3] tests/xe_gpgpu_fill: Add offset-16x16 subtest Zbigniew Kempczyński
2024-11-14 13:37 ` Grzegorzek, Dominik
2024-11-14 14:05 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for GPGPU fill improvements Patchwork
2024-11-14 16:12 ` Zbigniew Kempczyński
2024-11-14 14:13 ` ✓ CI.xeBAT: success " Patchwork
2024-11-15 2:35 ` ✗ CI.xeFULL: failure " Patchwork
2024-11-18 22:17 ` ✗ GitLab.Pipeline: warning for GPGPU fill improvements (rev2) Patchwork
2024-11-18 22:41 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-11-18 23:00 ` ✗ CI.xeBAT: " Patchwork
2024-11-19 9:05 ` ✗ CI.xeFULL: " Patchwork
2024-11-19 19:01 ` ✓ CI.xeBAT: success for GPGPU fill improvements (rev3) Patchwork
2024-11-19 19:17 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-11-20 5:08 ` ✗ CI.xeFULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0fd2b463db40d47c60b64661b3a9a328d04153ad.camel@intel.com \
--to=dominik.grzegorzek@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox