From: "Sharma, Swati2" <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>, <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t] lib/dsc: use intel_display_caps instead of i915_display_capabilities
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 15:00:45 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <11948989-bead-4a14-8659-a86ccf0dd139@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878qos87nx.fsf@intel.com>
Hi Jani,
Thanks for the reply.
Patch LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
On 26-03-2025 02:56 pm, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Mar 2025, "Sharma, Swati2" <swati2.sharma@intel.com> wrote:
>> Hi Jani,
>>
>> Have few queries:
>> 1. Are we going to remove i915_display_capabilities ?
> Yes, hence the patch at hand. Can't remove it before merging this.
>
> intel_display_caps already has more information than
> i915_display_capabilities, and I intend to add more.
>
>> 2. Since this new debugfs intel_display_caps, has prefix "intel" whereas
>> all other debugfs still has "i915"
>> Are we going to make this change to other display related debugfs too?
> Eventually, yes. The xe driver having debugfs files with i915 prefix is
> quite confusing.
>
> I think new debugfs files should be prefixed intel_ while any rename
> will need more careful consideration. It's quite the flag day change.
>
> This one's easier as i915_display_capabilities and intel_display_caps
> already coexist.
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
>> On 25-03-2025 06:38 pm, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>> Turns out we've added two similar files in kernel. Consolidate on
>>> intel_display_caps as the more driver independent name.
>>>
>>> Cc: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> lib/igt_dsc.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/lib/igt_dsc.c b/lib/igt_dsc.c
>>> index 8d259b7344a6..4caad39db7a9 100644
>>> --- a/lib/igt_dsc.c
>>> +++ b/lib/igt_dsc.c
>>> @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ bool igt_is_dsc_supported_by_source(int drmfd)
>>> dir = igt_debugfs_dir(drmfd);
>>> igt_assert(dir >= 0);
>>>
>>> - res = igt_debugfs_simple_read(dir, "i915_display_capabilities",
>>> + res = igt_debugfs_simple_read(dir, "intel_display_caps",
>>> buf, sizeof(buf));
>>> close(dir);
>>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-26 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-25 13:08 [PATCH i-g-t] lib/dsc: use intel_display_caps instead of i915_display_capabilities Jani Nikula
2025-03-25 18:11 ` Anirban, Sk
2025-03-26 0:53 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2025-03-26 1:11 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2025-03-26 9:50 ` Jani Nikula
2025-03-26 10:51 ` Saarinen, Jani
2025-03-26 5:54 ` [PATCH i-g-t] " Sharma, Swati2
2025-03-26 9:26 ` Jani Nikula
2025-03-26 9:30 ` Sharma, Swati2 [this message]
2025-03-27 7:44 ` Jani Nikula
2025-03-26 12:25 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure for " Patchwork
2025-03-28 9:43 ` Patchwork
2025-04-06 14:56 ` Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=11948989-bead-4a14-8659-a86ccf0dd139@intel.com \
--to=swati2.sharma@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=vinod.govindapillai@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox