igt-dev.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
To: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>,
	igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v7] tests/kms_rotation_crc: Move platform checks to one place for non exhaust fence cases
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 20:26:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1532402766.3356.23.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1532400764.3356.7.camel@intel.com>

On Mon, 2018-07-23 at 19:52 -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-07-23 at 11:25 -0700, Radhakrishna Sripada wrote:
> > 
> > From: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
> > 
> > Cleanup the testcases by moving the platform checks to a single
> > function.
> > 
> > The earlier version of the path is posted here [1]
> > 
> > v2: Make use of the property enums to get the supported rotations
> > v3: Move hardcodings to a single function(Ville)
> > v4: Include the cherryview exception for reflect subtest(Maarten)
> > v5: Rebase and move the check from CNL to ICL for reflect-x case
> > v6: Fix the CI regression
> > v7: rebase
> > 
> > [1]: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/209647/
> > 
> Oh well, I wrote my comments below and then read this link. Please
> add
> new test requirements in separate patches. Only have the code
> movement
> here.
> 

Quoting Ville from [1] above

"Perhaps the best solution would be to make it as generic as possible
by checking the plane supported rotations, while still keeoing the
manual checks for the few exceptions I listed above. Might even be
nice to put the generic stuff into something like
igt_plane_has_rotation(). And maybe the exceptions should be there
as well?"

If I am reading this correctly, this patch should have retained the
plane property checks in addition to exceptions you have added.

-DK

> > 
> > Cc: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com
> > >
> > ---
> >  tests/kms_rotation_crc.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> >  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c b/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c
> > index 6cb5858adb0f..f20b8a6d4ba1 100644
> > --- a/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c
> > +++ b/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c
> > @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ typedef struct {
> >  	uint32_t override_fmt;
> >  	uint64_t override_tiling;
> >  	int devid;
> > +	int gen;
> >  } data_t;
> >  
> >  typedef struct {
> > @@ -284,6 +285,17 @@ static void prepare_fbs(data_t *data,
> > igt_output_t *output,
> >  		igt_plane_set_position(plane, data->pos_x, data-
> > > 
> > > pos_y);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static void igt_check_rotation(data_t *data)
> > +{
> > +	if (data->rotation & (IGT_ROTATION_90 | IGT_ROTATION_270))
> > +		igt_require(data->gen >= 9);
> > +	if (data->rotation & IGT_REFLECT_X)
> > +		igt_require(data->gen >= 11 ||
> This check used to be igt_require(gen >= 10
> 
> > 
> > +			    (IS_CHERRYVIEW(data->devid) && (data-
> > > 
> > > rotation & IGT_ROTATION_0)));
> There was also a check for tiling format 
> -                                   (IS_CHERRYVIEW(data.devid) &&
> reflect_x->rot == IGT_ROTATION_0
> -                                    && reflect_x->tiling ==
> LOCAL_I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED));
> 
> 
> > 
> > +	if (data->rotation & IGT_ROTATION_180)
> > +		igt_require(data->gen >= 4);
> Doesn't look like this requirement was is in the test earlier.
> 
> > 
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void test_single_case(data_t *data, enum pipe pipe,
> >  			     igt_output_t *output, igt_plane_t
> > *plane,
> >  			     enum rectangle_type rect,
> > @@ -352,15 +364,18 @@ static void test_plane_rotation(data_t *data,
> > int plane_type, bool test_bad_form
> >  
> >  	igt_display_require_output(display);
> >  
> > +	igt_check_rotation(data);
> > +
> >  	for_each_pipe_with_valid_output(display, pipe, output) {
> >  		igt_plane_t *plane;
> >  		int i, j;
> >  
> > -		if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(data->devid) && pipe != PIPE_B)
> > -			continue;
> > -
> >  		igt_output_set_pipe(output, pipe);
> >  
> > +		if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(data->devid) && (data->rotation
> > &
> > IGT_REFLECT_X) &&
> > +		    pipe != kmstest_pipe_to_index('B'))
> > +			continue;
> > +
> Why do this? 
> 
> > 
> >  		plane = igt_output_get_plane_type(output,
> > plane_type);
> >  		igt_require(igt_plane_has_prop(plane,
> > IGT_PLANE_ROTATION));
> >  
> > @@ -521,14 +536,13 @@ igt_main
> >  	};
> >  
> >  	data_t data = {};
> > -	int gen = 0;
> >  
> >  	igt_skip_on_simulation();
> >  
> >  	igt_fixture {
> >  		data.gfx_fd =
> > drm_open_driver_master(DRIVER_INTEL);
> >  		data.devid = intel_get_drm_devid(data.gfx_fd);
> > -		gen = intel_gen(data.devid);
> > +		data.gen = intel_gen(data.devid);
> >  
> >  		kmstest_set_vt_graphics_mode();
> >  
> > @@ -541,16 +555,12 @@ igt_main
> >  		igt_subtest_f("%s-rotation-%s",
> >  			      plane_test_str(subtest->plane),
> >  			      rot_test_str(subtest->rot)) {
> > -			igt_require(!(subtest->rot &
> > -				    (IGT_ROTATION_90 |
> > IGT_ROTATION_270)) ||
> > -				    gen >= 9);
> >  			data.rotation = subtest->rot;
> >  			test_plane_rotation(&data, subtest->plane,
> > false);
> >  		}
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	igt_subtest_f("sprite-rotation-90-pos-100-0") {
> > -		igt_require(gen >= 9);
> >  		data.rotation = IGT_ROTATION_90;
> >  		data.pos_x = 100,
> >  		data.pos_y = 0;
> > @@ -560,7 +570,6 @@ igt_main
> >  	data.pos_y = 0;
> >  
> >  	igt_subtest_f("bad-pixel-format") {
> > -		igt_require(gen >= 9);
> >  		data.rotation = IGT_ROTATION_90;
> >  		data.override_fmt = DRM_FORMAT_RGB565;
> >  		test_plane_rotation(&data, DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY,
> > true);
> > @@ -568,7 +577,6 @@ igt_main
> >  	data.override_fmt = 0;
> >  
> >  	igt_subtest_f("bad-tiling") {
> > -		igt_require(gen >= 9);
> >  		data.rotation = IGT_ROTATION_90;
> >  		data.override_tiling =
> > LOCAL_I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED;
> >  		test_plane_rotation(&data, DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY,
> > true);
> > @@ -579,9 +587,6 @@ igt_main
> >  		igt_subtest_f("primary-%s-reflect-x-%s",
> >  			      tiling_test_str(reflect_x->tiling),
> >  			      rot_test_str(reflect_x->rot)) {
> > -			igt_require(gen >= 10 ||
> > -				    (IS_CHERRYVIEW(data.devid) &&
> > reflect_x->rot == IGT_ROTATION_0
> > -				     && reflect_x->tiling ==
> > LOCAL_I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED));
> >  			data.rotation = (IGT_REFLECT_X |
> > reflect_x-
> > > 
> > > rot);
> >  			data.override_tiling = reflect_x->tiling;
> >  			test_plane_rotation(&data,
> > DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY, false);
> > @@ -596,7 +601,7 @@ igt_main
> >  		enum pipe pipe;
> >  		igt_output_t *output;
> >  
> > -		igt_require(gen >= 9);
> > +		igt_require(data.gen >= 9);
> >  		igt_display_require_output(&data.display);
> >  
> >  		for_each_pipe_with_valid_output(&data.display,
> > pipe,
> > output) {
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-24  3:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-23 18:25 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v7] tests/kms_rotation_crc: Move platform checks to one place for non exhaust fence cases Radhakrishna Sripada
2018-07-23 18:58 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for tests/kms_rotation_crc: Move platform checks to one place for non exhaust fence cases (rev5) Patchwork
2018-07-23 20:23 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-07-24  2:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v7] tests/kms_rotation_crc: Move platform checks to one place for non exhaust fence cases Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-07-24  3:26   ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan [this message]
2018-07-27 20:43     ` Radhakrishna Sripada
2018-07-27 22:06       ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-07-27 22:26         ` Radhakrishna Sripada

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1532402766.3356.23.camel@intel.com \
    --to=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).