From: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
To: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v7] tests/kms_rotation_crc: Move platform checks to one place for non exhaust fence cases
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 15:06:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1532729179.7639.41.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180727204348.5m5ou5kx4psept55@InViCtUs>
On Fri, 2018-07-27 at 13:43 -0700, Radhakrishna Sripada wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 08:26:06PM -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2018-07-23 at 19:52 -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2018-07-23 at 11:25 -0700, Radhakrishna Sripada wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > From: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
> > > >
> > > > Cleanup the testcases by moving the platform checks to a single
> > > > function.
> > > >
> > > > The earlier version of the path is posted here [1]
> > > >
> > > > v2: Make use of the property enums to get the supported
> > > > rotations
> > > > v3: Move hardcodings to a single function(Ville)
> > > > v4: Include the cherryview exception for reflect
> > > > subtest(Maarten)
> > > > v5: Rebase and move the check from CNL to ICL for reflect-x
> > > > case
> > > > v6: Fix the CI regression
> > > > v7: rebase
> > > >
> > > > [1]: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/209647/
> > > >
> > > Oh well, I wrote my comments below and then read this link.
> > > Please
> > > add
> > > new test requirements in separate patches. Only have the code
> > > movement
> > > here.
> > >
> > Quoting Ville from [1] above
> >
> > "Perhaps the best solution would be to make it as generic as
> > possible
> > by checking the plane supported rotations, while still keeoing the
> > manual checks for the few exceptions I listed above. Might even be
> > nice to put the generic stuff into something like
> > igt_plane_has_rotation(). And maybe the exceptions should be there
> > as well?"
> >
> > If I am reading this correctly, this patch should have retained the
> > plane property checks in addition to exceptions you have added.
> Based on the feedback received from patch v2 [1], we moved back to
> using
> the platform checks instead of using the connector property.
>
Okay, I am not reading the comment, specifically "make it as generic as
possible by checking the plane supported rotations", the way you are.
Check with Ville.
Anyway, if you want to add new platform checks, I do not recommend
adding all of them in a single patch.
>
> [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/209647/
> >
> >
> > -DK
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Cc: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
> > > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> > > > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> > > > Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel
> > > > .com
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > tests/kms_rotation_crc.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
> > > > -----
> > > > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c
> > > > b/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c
> > > > index 6cb5858adb0f..f20b8a6d4ba1 100644
> > > > --- a/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c
> > > > +++ b/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c
> > > > @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ typedef struct {
> > > > uint32_t override_fmt;
> > > > uint64_t override_tiling;
> > > > int devid;
> > > > + int gen;
> > > > } data_t;
> > > >
> > > > typedef struct {
> > > > @@ -284,6 +285,17 @@ static void prepare_fbs(data_t *data,
> > > > igt_output_t *output,
> > > > igt_plane_set_position(plane, data->pos_x,
> > > > data-
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > pos_y);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +static void igt_check_rotation(data_t *data)
> > > > +{
> > > > + if (data->rotation & (IGT_ROTATION_90 |
> > > > IGT_ROTATION_270))
> > > > + igt_require(data->gen >= 9);
> > > > + if (data->rotation & IGT_REFLECT_X)
> > > > + igt_require(data->gen >= 11 ||
> > > This check used to be igt_require(gen >= 10
> Will move it back to gen10.
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > + (IS_CHERRYVIEW(data->devid) &&
> > > > (data-
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > rotation & IGT_ROTATION_0)));
> > > There was also a check for tiling format
> > > - (IS_CHERRYVIEW(data.devid) &&
> > > reflect_x->rot == IGT_ROTATION_0
> > > - && reflect_x->tiling ==
> > > LOCAL_I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED));
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > + if (data->rotation & IGT_ROTATION_180)
> > > > + igt_require(data->gen >= 4);
> > > Doesn't look like this requirement was is in the test earlier.
> > >
> This is the requirement present in the kernel and got included here
> on suggestion from here[1].
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > static void test_single_case(data_t *data, enum pipe pipe,
> > > > igt_output_t *output, igt_plane_t
> > > > *plane,
> > > > enum rectangle_type rect,
> > > > @@ -352,15 +364,18 @@ static void test_plane_rotation(data_t
> > > > *data,
> > > > int plane_type, bool test_bad_form
> > > >
> > > > igt_display_require_output(display);
> > > >
> > > > + igt_check_rotation(data);
> > > > +
> > > > for_each_pipe_with_valid_output(display, pipe, output)
> > > > {
> > > > igt_plane_t *plane;
> > > > int i, j;
> > > >
> > > > - if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(data->devid) && pipe !=
> > > > PIPE_B)
> > > > - continue;
> > > > -
> > > > igt_output_set_pipe(output, pipe);
> > > >
> > > > + if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(data->devid) && (data-
> > > > >rotation
> > > > &
> > > > IGT_REFLECT_X) &&
> > > > + pipe != kmstest_pipe_to_index('B'))
> > > > + continue;
> > > > +
> > > Why do this?
> > >
> On braswell reflectx is supported only on Pipe B and the test case
> needs to be skipped for pipes A,C.
>
>
> Regards,
> Radhhakrishna(RK) Sripada
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > plane = igt_output_get_plane_type(output,
> > > > plane_type);
> > > > igt_require(igt_plane_has_prop(plane,
> > > > IGT_PLANE_ROTATION));
> > > >
> > > > @@ -521,14 +536,13 @@ igt_main
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > data_t data = {};
> > > > - int gen = 0;
> > > >
> > > > igt_skip_on_simulation();
> > > >
> > > > igt_fixture {
> > > > data.gfx_fd =
> > > > drm_open_driver_master(DRIVER_INTEL);
> > > > data.devid = intel_get_drm_devid(data.gfx_fd);
> > > > - gen = intel_gen(data.devid);
> > > > + data.gen = intel_gen(data.devid);
> > > >
> > > > kmstest_set_vt_graphics_mode();
> > > >
> > > > @@ -541,16 +555,12 @@ igt_main
> > > > igt_subtest_f("%s-rotation-%s",
> > > > plane_test_str(subtest->plane),
> > > > rot_test_str(subtest->rot)) {
> > > > - igt_require(!(subtest->rot &
> > > > - (IGT_ROTATION_90 |
> > > > IGT_ROTATION_270)) ||
> > > > - gen >= 9);
> > > > data.rotation = subtest->rot;
> > > > test_plane_rotation(&data, subtest-
> > > > >plane,
> > > > false);
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > igt_subtest_f("sprite-rotation-90-pos-100-0") {
> > > > - igt_require(gen >= 9);
> > > > data.rotation = IGT_ROTATION_90;
> > > > data.pos_x = 100,
> > > > data.pos_y = 0;
> > > > @@ -560,7 +570,6 @@ igt_main
> > > > data.pos_y = 0;
> > > >
> > > > igt_subtest_f("bad-pixel-format") {
> > > > - igt_require(gen >= 9);
> > > > data.rotation = IGT_ROTATION_90;
> > > > data.override_fmt = DRM_FORMAT_RGB565;
> > > > test_plane_rotation(&data,
> > > > DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY,
> > > > true);
> > > > @@ -568,7 +577,6 @@ igt_main
> > > > data.override_fmt = 0;
> > > >
> > > > igt_subtest_f("bad-tiling") {
> > > > - igt_require(gen >= 9);
> > > > data.rotation = IGT_ROTATION_90;
> > > > data.override_tiling =
> > > > LOCAL_I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED;
> > > > test_plane_rotation(&data,
> > > > DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY,
> > > > true);
> > > > @@ -579,9 +587,6 @@ igt_main
> > > > igt_subtest_f("primary-%s-reflect-x-%s",
> > > > tiling_test_str(reflect_x-
> > > > >tiling),
> > > > rot_test_str(reflect_x->rot)) {
> > > > - igt_require(gen >= 10 ||
> > > > - (IS_CHERRYVIEW(data.devid)
> > > > &&
> > > > reflect_x->rot == IGT_ROTATION_0
> > > > - && reflect_x->tiling ==
> > > > LOCAL_I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED));
> > > > data.rotation = (IGT_REFLECT_X |
> > > > reflect_x-
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > rot);
> > > > data.override_tiling = reflect_x-
> > > > >tiling;
> > > > test_plane_rotation(&data,
> > > > DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY, false);
> > > > @@ -596,7 +601,7 @@ igt_main
> > > > enum pipe pipe;
> > > > igt_output_t *output;
> > > >
> > > > - igt_require(gen >= 9);
> > > > + igt_require(data.gen >= 9);
> > > > igt_display_require_output(&data.display);
> > > >
> > > > for_each_pipe_with_valid_output(&data.display,
> > > > pipe,
> > > > output) {
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-27 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-23 18:25 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v7] tests/kms_rotation_crc: Move platform checks to one place for non exhaust fence cases Radhakrishna Sripada
2018-07-23 18:58 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for tests/kms_rotation_crc: Move platform checks to one place for non exhaust fence cases (rev5) Patchwork
2018-07-23 20:23 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-07-24 2:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v7] tests/kms_rotation_crc: Move platform checks to one place for non exhaust fence cases Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-07-24 3:26 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-07-27 20:43 ` Radhakrishna Sripada
2018-07-27 22:06 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan [this message]
2018-07-27 22:26 ` Radhakrishna Sripada
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1532729179.7639.41.camel@intel.com \
--to=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
--cc=anusha.srivatsa@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).