Re: ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure for runner/kmemleak: Remove unnecessary lseek() calls

[Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@linux.intel.com>]

Dear I915,

On 11.03.2025 22:50, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: runner/kmemleak: Remove unnecessary lseek() calls
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/146105/
> State : failure
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> CI Bug Log - changes from XEIGT_8270_full -> XEIGTPW_12739_full
> ====================================================
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
>   **FAILURE**
> 
>   Serious unknown changes coming with XEIGTPW_12739_full absolutely need to be
>   verified manually.
>   
>   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>   introduced in XEIGTPW_12739_full, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
>   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> 
>   
> 
> Participating hosts (4 -> 4)
> ------------------------------
> 
>   No changes in participating hosts
> 
> Possible new issues
> -------------------
> 
>   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in XEIGTPW_12739_full:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
> #### Possible regressions ####
> 
>   * igt@xe_fault_injection@vm-bind-fail-vm_bind_ioctl_ops_execute:
>     - shard-bmg:          [PASS][1] -> [ABORT][2]
>    [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_8270/shard-bmg-2/igt@xe_fault_injection@vm-bind-fail-vm_bind_ioctl_ops_execute.html
>    [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_12739/shard-bmg-8/igt@xe_fault_injection@vm-bind-fail-vm_bind_ioctl_ops_execute.html
>     - shard-dg2-set2:     [PASS][3] -> [ABORT][4]
>    [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_8270/shard-dg2-464/igt@xe_fault_injection@vm-bind-fail-vm_bind_ioctl_ops_execute.html
>    [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_12739/shard-dg2-466/igt@xe_fault_injection@vm-bind-fail-vm_bind_ioctl_ops_execute.html

These are unrelated to my change.

Thank you,

Peter