From: "Michał Grzelak" <michal.grzelak@intel.com>
To: "Thasleem, Mohammed" <mohammed.thasleem@intel.com>
Cc: "Michał Grzelak" <michal.grzelak@intel.com>,
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t v8 6/6] tests/kms_flip: test suspend at most twice on SNB && BMG
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 10:28:50 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17afd2fc-7994-2e40-02da-f7725c58ccc5@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a9ecfa3b-5ae3-40c1-9a5f-04c598386fdc@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2282 bytes --]
On Wed, 25 Mar 2026, Thasleem, Mohammed wrote:
> On 09-03-2026 02:55 pm, Michał Grzelak wrote:
>
> gettime_us() on SNB and BMG does not return proper time after starting
> suspend tests. This results in too many suspends issued before we hit
> the duration_ms. Break the loop on second execution.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michał Grzelak <michal.grzelak@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/kms_flip.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/kms_flip.c b/tests/kms_flip.c
> index f17d027cc..3c5428ff0 100755
> --- a/tests/kms_flip.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_flip.c
> @@ -1322,6 +1322,12 @@ static bool event_loop(struct test_output *o, unsigned duration_ms,
> {
> unsigned long start, end;
> int count = 0;
> + int devid;
> + bool wa;
> +
> + devid = intel_get_drm_devid(drm_fd);
> +
> + wa = IS_SANDYBRIDGE(devid) || IS_BATTLEMAGE(devid);
>
> Why only two specific platforms?
That I would also like to know. :)
As it is described in the first sentence of the commit message, these
two platforms have been reported by CI to encounter such issue. If it is
not clear, I can update the commit message.
> I think, platform specific wa not needed here, instead we can have generic execution for all,
> which can work on all platforms. plz check.
Since we are observing the issue only on those two platforms, I don't
see how to work around it without specifying those two platforms,
without changing the already present functionality.
>
>
> start = gettime_us();
>
> @@ -1342,6 +1348,9 @@ static bool event_loop(struct test_output *o, unsigned duration_ms,
> if (count && (gettime_us() - start) / 1000 >= duration_ms)
> break;
>
> + if (count && wa && o->flags & TEST_SUSPEND)
>
> if (count && wa && o->flags & TEST_SUSPEND) --> if (count && o->flags & TEST_SUSPEND)
>
> + break;
> +
I am unsure of this approach. This will break the loop on second run on
every suspend test, on every platform. While commit c75dcbdac51d
("tests/kms_flip: various improvements") says explicitly to do at least
two rounds of tests, so it would change functionality on every platform.
I can refactor the patch, but I would retain the WA. Can you provide
some rationale for changing the functionality on non-affected platforms?
BR,
Michał
> count++;
> }
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-26 9:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-09 9:25 [PATCH i-g-t v8 0/6] kms_flip: limit number of subtests run Michał Grzelak
2026-03-09 9:25 ` [PATCH i-g-t v8 1/6] tests/kms_flip: test suspend on one pair of pipes Michał Grzelak
2026-03-17 7:44 ` Thasleem, Mohammed
2026-03-09 9:25 ` [PATCH i-g-t v8 2/6] tests/kms_flip: run suspend tests on one pipe per output Michał Grzelak
2026-03-09 9:25 ` [PATCH i-g-t v8 3/6] tests/kms_flip: limit output pairs when testing suspend Michał Grzelak
2026-03-14 14:51 ` Thasleem, Mohammed
2026-03-09 9:25 ` [PATCH i-g-t v8 4/6] tests/kms_flip: limit number of outputs wrt suspend Michał Grzelak
2026-03-14 11:56 ` Thasleem, Mohammed
2026-03-25 23:39 ` Michał Grzelak
2026-03-09 9:25 ` [PATCH i-g-t v8 5/6] tests/kms_flip: staticize & remove unused global vars Michał Grzelak
2026-03-14 11:30 ` Thasleem, Mohammed
2026-03-09 9:25 ` [PATCH i-g-t v8 6/6] tests/kms_flip: test suspend at most twice on SNB && BMG Michał Grzelak
2026-03-25 10:30 ` Thasleem, Mohammed
2026-03-26 9:28 ` Michał Grzelak [this message]
2026-03-26 15:16 ` Thasleem, Mohammed
2026-03-09 14:14 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for kms_flip: limit number of subtests run (rev10) Patchwork
2026-03-09 14:29 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2026-03-09 17:04 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
2026-03-10 20:53 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for kms_flip: limit number of subtests run (rev11) Patchwork
2026-03-10 21:35 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-03-11 10:22 ` ✓ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2026-03-11 15:06 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17afd2fc-7994-2e40-02da-f7725c58ccc5@intel.com \
--to=michal.grzelak@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mohammed.thasleem@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox