From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 088DB10E039 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2023 09:13:03 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <17bd5bee-d5ff-9351-ed9b-e917b780d491@intel.com> Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 14:42:43 +0530 Content-Language: en-US To: Kunal Joshi , References: <20231001103006.431894-1-kunal1.joshi@intel.com> From: "Modem, Bhanuprakash" In-Reply-To: <20231001103006.431894-1-kunal1.joshi@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 0/2] Add test for hotplug validation in simulation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: igt-dev-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "igt-dev" List-ID: Hi Kunal, On Sun-01-10-2023 04:00 pm, Kunal Joshi wrote: > Test to validate hotplug in simulation environment we > have scratch pad register 0x4f080 from which we can > trigger uevents such as HPD, VBLANK..etc, Idea is to > have port mapping placed in igtrcthrough which test > can write to 0x4f080 and check if we get hotplug In first glance, do we really need to upstream this test? I am pretty sure, no one (including Intel) is going to use this test from upstream repo (We don't have any simulation environment in public CI). So, we can't merge this. + Kamil, thoughts? - Bhanu > > Cc: Karthik B S > Cc: Bhanuprakash Modem > Signed-off-by: Kunal Joshi > > Kunal Joshi (2): > tests/kms_simulation_hpd: New test for hotplug validation > tests/meson: added test to meson.build > > tests/intel/kms_simulation_hpd.c | 534 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > tests/meson.build | 1 + > 2 files changed, 535 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 tests/intel/kms_simulation_hpd.c >