From: "Bernatowicz, Marcin" <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>
To: "K V P, Satyanarayana" <satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com>,
"igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org" <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Kolakowski, Jakub1" <jakub1.kolakowski@intel.com>,
"Tauro, Riana" <riana.tauro@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/intel/xe_pmu: Unprovision VFs on cleanup
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 15:05:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19df39b5-933f-4dac-9240-daa44194faf0@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <LV3PR11MB86959312120282B055C39F93F989A@LV3PR11MB8695.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On 5/6/2025 2:51 PM, K V P, Satyanarayana wrote:
> Hi.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Marcin Bernatowicz <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2025 3:46 PM
>> To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
>> Cc: Marcin Bernatowicz <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>; Kolakowski,
>> Jakub1 <jakub1.kolakowski@intel.com>; Tauro, Riana
>> <riana.tauro@intel.com>; K V P, Satyanarayana
>> <satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/intel/xe_pmu: Unprovision VFs on cleanup
>>
>> Unprovision VFs to ensure a clean state for subsequent tests.
>> Rename disable_vfs() to unprovision_and_disable_vfs() to reflect the
>> additional cleanup steps.
>>
>> Cc: Jakub Kolakowski <jakub1.kolakowski@intel.com>
>> Cc: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
>> Cc: Satyanarayana K V P <satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Marcin Bernatowicz <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> tests/intel/xe_pmu.c | 11 +++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_pmu.c b/tests/intel/xe_pmu.c
>> index 094dc0c6c..8cbbf6916 100644
>> --- a/tests/intel/xe_pmu.c
>> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_pmu.c
>> @@ -497,12 +497,15 @@ static unsigned int enable_and_provision_vfs(int
>> fd)
>> return num_vfs;
>> }
>>
>> -static void disable_vfs(int fd)
>> +static void unprovision_and_disable_vfs(int fd)
>> {
>> - unsigned int gt;
>> + unsigned int gt, num_vfs = igt_sriov_get_enabled_vfs(fd);
>>
>> - xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt)
>> + xe_for_each_gt(fd, gt) {
>> xe_sriov_set_sched_if_idle(fd, gt, 0);
>> + for (int fn = 0; fn <= num_vfs; fn++)
>> + xe_sriov_set_exec_quantum_ms(fd, fn, gt, 0);
>> + }
>>
> Do we need to set exec quantum for VFs, when un-provisioning and disabling VFs?
> Any specific reason for doing this?
> -Satya.
The settings stored by PF persist across VF enable/disable cycles.
--
marcin
>> igt_sriov_disable_vfs(fd);
>> /* abort to avoid execution of next tests with enabled VFs */
>> @@ -596,7 +599,7 @@ igt_main
>> }
>>
>> igt_fixture
>> - disable_vfs(fd);
>> + unprovision_and_disable_vfs(fd);
>> }
>>
>> igt_subtest_group {
>> --
>> 2.31.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-06 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-06 10:15 [PATCH i-g-t 0/2] tests/intel/xe_pmu: Improve VF setup and cleanup Marcin Bernatowicz
2025-05-06 10:15 ` [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/intel/xe_pmu: Unprovision VFs on cleanup Marcin Bernatowicz
2025-05-06 12:51 ` K V P, Satyanarayana
2025-05-06 13:05 ` Bernatowicz, Marcin [this message]
2025-05-06 13:37 ` K V P, Satyanarayana
2025-05-06 10:15 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/intel/xe_pmu: Check default scheduling attributes before test Marcin Bernatowicz
2025-05-06 12:53 ` K V P, Satyanarayana
2025-05-06 11:27 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure for tests/intel/xe_pmu: Improve VF setup and cleanup Patchwork
2025-05-06 11:32 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-05-06 13:00 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-05-12 8:07 ` Bernatowicz, Marcin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19df39b5-933f-4dac-9240-daa44194faf0@linux.intel.com \
--to=marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jakub1.kolakowski@intel.com \
--cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
--cc=satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox