Igt-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2 2/3] lib: Parse plane IN_FORMATS blobifiers into a nicer form
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 23:19:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180313211914.GC5453@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <152097459933.515.1890704959553501946@mail.alporthouse.com>

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 08:56:39PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Ville Syrjala (2018-03-13 18:30:13)
> > +       for (int i = 0; i < blob_data->count_modifiers; i++) {
> > +               for (int j = 0; j < 64; j++) {
> > +                       const struct drm_format_modifier *modifiers =
> > +                               modifiers_ptr(blob_data);
> > +                       const uint32_t *formats = formats_ptr(blob_data);
> > +
> > +                       if (!(modifiers[i].formats & (1ULL << j)))
> > +                               continue;
> > +
> > +                       plane->formats[idx] = formats[modifiers[i].offset + j];
> 
> So far everything has been byte offset, but for drm_format_modifier you
> now switch to an index offset. In drm_plane.c, I only found
> drm_format_modifier.offset = 0 and no examples of a non-zero offset to
> check against.
> 
> I presume you know what you are doing. :)

Possibly. IIRC the offset is was just supposed to be n*64 to index more
than 64 formats. But of course it's all very much theoretical until a
plane exposes that many formats.

> 
> Otherwise the code looks consistent with itself and drm_plane.c
> 
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> -Chris

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-13 21:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-12 20:42 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/3] lib: Add igt_hweight{32,64} Ville Syrjala
2018-03-12 20:42 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] lib: Parse plane IN_FORMATS blobifiers into a nicer form Ville Syrjala
2018-03-13 18:30   ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2 " Ville Syrjala
2018-03-13 20:56     ` Chris Wilson
2018-03-13 21:19       ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2018-03-12 20:42 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 3/3] tests/kms_addfb_basic: Check that addfb2 accepts/rejects the expected formats Ville Syrjala
2018-03-13  0:14 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [i-g-t,1/3] lib: Add igt_hweight{32,64} Patchwork
2018-03-13  0:21 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/3] " Chris Wilson
2018-03-13  5:40 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [i-g-t,1/3] " Patchwork
2018-03-13 18:29 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2 1/3] lib: Add igt_hweight() Ville Syrjala
2018-03-13 20:49   ` Chris Wilson
2018-03-13 19:16 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for series starting with [i-g-t,v2,1/3] lib: Add igt_hweight() (rev3) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180313211914.GC5453@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox