* [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/gem_ctx_isoation: Remove dead code
@ 2018-09-06 16:51 Antonio Argenziano
2018-09-06 16:58 ` Chris Wilson
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Antonio Argenziano @ 2018-09-06 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: igt-dev
Probably just leftover code that escaped review.
Signed-off-by: Antonio Argenziano <antonio.argenziano@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
tests/gem_ctx_isolation.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/gem_ctx_isolation.c b/tests/gem_ctx_isolation.c
index 4325e1c2..6b4e9260 100644
--- a/tests/gem_ctx_isolation.c
+++ b/tests/gem_ctx_isolation.c
@@ -700,7 +700,6 @@ igt_main
igt_require(has_context_isolation);
gen = intel_gen(intel_get_drm_devid(fd));
- //igt_ci_fail_on(gen > LAST_KNOWN_GEN);
igt_skip_on(gen > LAST_KNOWN_GEN);
}
--
2.16.2
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/gem_ctx_isoation: Remove dead code
2018-09-06 16:51 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/gem_ctx_isoation: Remove dead code Antonio Argenziano
@ 2018-09-06 16:58 ` Chris Wilson
2018-09-06 17:05 ` Antonio Argenziano
2018-09-06 17:15 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2018-09-07 14:02 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2018-09-06 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Antonio Argenziano, igt-dev
Quoting Antonio Argenziano (2018-09-06 17:51:56)
> Probably just leftover code that escaped review.
The '//' indicates a wish that igt_ci_fail_on() existed. The problem as
it currently stands is that we don't get a big warning to update this
test for future gen. iirc the intent was to try and reinforce that this
was a test limitation for CI and shouldn't alarm any other user.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/gem_ctx_isoation: Remove dead code
2018-09-06 16:58 ` Chris Wilson
@ 2018-09-06 17:05 ` Antonio Argenziano
2018-09-06 17:19 ` Chris Wilson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Antonio Argenziano @ 2018-09-06 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson, igt-dev
On 06/09/18 09:58, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Antonio Argenziano (2018-09-06 17:51:56)
>> Probably just leftover code that escaped review.
>
> The '//' indicates a wish that igt_ci_fail_on() existed. The problem as
> it currently stands is that we don't get a big warning to update this
> test for future gen. iirc the intent was to try and reinforce that this
> was a test limitation for CI and shouldn't alarm any other user.
Change it to an igt_warn()? Not sure how CI deals with those but maybe
we can ask to mark them in a special way.
Antonio
> -Chris
>
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/gem_ctx_isoation: Remove dead code
2018-09-06 17:05 ` Antonio Argenziano
@ 2018-09-06 17:19 ` Chris Wilson
2018-09-07 7:11 ` Petri Latvala
2018-09-10 11:51 ` Joonas Lahtinen
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2018-09-06 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Antonio Argenziano, igt-dev
Quoting Antonio Argenziano (2018-09-06 18:05:48)
>
>
> On 06/09/18 09:58, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting Antonio Argenziano (2018-09-06 17:51:56)
> >> Probably just leftover code that escaped review.
> >
> > The '//' indicates a wish that igt_ci_fail_on() existed. The problem as
> > it currently stands is that we don't get a big warning to update this
> > test for future gen. iirc the intent was to try and reinforce that this
> > was a test limitation for CI and shouldn't alarm any other user.
>
> Change it to an igt_warn()? Not sure how CI deals with those but maybe
> we can ask to mark them in a special way.
Seems reasonable. I can't remember if igt_warn + SKIP == orange flag in
CI. If it does, yes that seems fine. It doesn't really matter that much,
I just don't like indicating a fail in the case test hasn't been run
because it is out of date. (But that's probably too much hairsplitting
on my part.)
-Chris
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/gem_ctx_isoation: Remove dead code
2018-09-06 17:19 ` Chris Wilson
@ 2018-09-07 7:11 ` Petri Latvala
2018-09-10 11:51 ` Joonas Lahtinen
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Petri Latvala @ 2018-09-07 7:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: igt-dev
On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 06:19:20PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Antonio Argenziano (2018-09-06 18:05:48)
> >
> >
> > On 06/09/18 09:58, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > Quoting Antonio Argenziano (2018-09-06 17:51:56)
> > >> Probably just leftover code that escaped review.
> > >
> > > The '//' indicates a wish that igt_ci_fail_on() existed. The problem as
> > > it currently stands is that we don't get a big warning to update this
> > > test for future gen. iirc the intent was to try and reinforce that this
> > > was a test limitation for CI and shouldn't alarm any other user.
> >
> > Change it to an igt_warn()? Not sure how CI deals with those but maybe
> > we can ask to mark them in a special way.
>
> Seems reasonable. I can't remember if igt_warn + SKIP == orange flag in
> CI. If it does, yes that seems fine. It doesn't really matter that much,
> I just don't like indicating a fail in the case test hasn't been run
> because it is out of date. (But that's probably too much hairsplitting
> on my part.)
For the record: Currently, no, igt_warn + SKIP == SKIP == grey.
Good news is that it's changeable easily as soon as igt_runner is used
in CI.
--
Petri Latvala
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/gem_ctx_isoation: Remove dead code
2018-09-06 17:19 ` Chris Wilson
2018-09-07 7:11 ` Petri Latvala
@ 2018-09-10 11:51 ` Joonas Lahtinen
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Joonas Lahtinen @ 2018-09-10 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Antonio Argenziano, Chris Wilson, igt-dev
Quoting Chris Wilson (2018-09-06 20:19:20)
> Quoting Antonio Argenziano (2018-09-06 18:05:48)
> >
> >
> > On 06/09/18 09:58, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > Quoting Antonio Argenziano (2018-09-06 17:51:56)
> > >> Probably just leftover code that escaped review.
> > >
> > > The '//' indicates a wish that igt_ci_fail_on() existed. The problem as
> > > it currently stands is that we don't get a big warning to update this
> > > test for future gen. iirc the intent was to try and reinforce that this
> > > was a test limitation for CI and shouldn't alarm any other user.
> >
> > Change it to an igt_warn()? Not sure how CI deals with those but maybe
> > we can ask to mark them in a special way.
>
> Seems reasonable. I can't remember if igt_warn + SKIP == orange flag in
> CI. If it does, yes that seems fine. It doesn't really matter that much,
> I just don't like indicating a fail in the case test hasn't been run
> because it is out of date. (But that's probably too much hairsplitting
> on my part.)
There's a typo in the patch title s/isoation/isolation/.
Regards, Joonas
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for tests/gem_ctx_isoation: Remove dead code
2018-09-06 16:51 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/gem_ctx_isoation: Remove dead code Antonio Argenziano
2018-09-06 16:58 ` Chris Wilson
@ 2018-09-06 17:15 ` Patchwork
2018-09-07 14:02 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2018-09-06 17:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Antonio Argenziano; +Cc: igt-dev
== Series Details ==
Series: tests/gem_ctx_isoation: Remove dead code
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/49287/
State : success
== Summary ==
= CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4782 -> IGTPW_1803 =
== Summary - WARNING ==
Minor unknown changes coming with IGTPW_1803 need to be verified
manually.
If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in IGTPW_1803, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
External URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/49287/revisions/1/mbox/
== Possible new issues ==
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in IGTPW_1803:
=== IGT changes ===
==== Warnings ====
igt@pm_rpm@basic-pci-d3-state:
fi-glk-j4005: PASS -> SKIP
== Known issues ==
Here are the changes found in IGTPW_1803 that come from known issues:
=== IGT changes ===
==== Issues hit ====
igt@drv_module_reload@basic-reload:
fi-glk-j4005: PASS -> DMESG-WARN (fdo#106725, fdo#106248)
igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3:
fi-cfl-8109u: PASS -> DMESG-WARN (fdo#107345)
fi-blb-e6850: PASS -> INCOMPLETE (fdo#107718)
igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-dpms:
fi-cfl-8109u: PASS -> INCOMPLETE (fdo#106070)
igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-modeset:
fi-glk-j4005: PASS -> DMESG-WARN (fdo#106000)
igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@read-crc-pipe-b-frame-sequence:
fi-glk-j4005: PASS -> DMESG-WARN (fdo#106238) +1
igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-b:
fi-snb-2520m: PASS -> INCOMPLETE (fdo#103713)
igt@kms_psr@primary_page_flip:
fi-kbl-r: PASS -> FAIL (fdo#107336)
igt@pm_rpm@module-reload:
fi-glk-j4005: PASS -> FAIL (fdo#107708, fdo#104767)
==== Possible fixes ====
igt@amdgpu/amd_cs_nop@sync-fork-gfx0:
fi-kbl-8809g: DMESG-WARN (fdo#107762) -> PASS
igt@kms_psr@primary_page_flip:
fi-kbl-7560u: FAIL (fdo#107336) -> PASS
==== Warnings ====
igt@amdgpu/amd_prime@amd-to-i915:
fi-kbl-8809g: DMESG-FAIL (fdo#107762) -> FAIL (fdo#107341)
fdo#103713 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103713
fdo#104767 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104767
fdo#106000 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106000
fdo#106070 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106070
fdo#106238 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106238
fdo#106248 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106248
fdo#106725 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106725
fdo#107336 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107336
fdo#107341 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107341
fdo#107345 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107345
fdo#107708 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107708
fdo#107718 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107718
fdo#107762 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107762
== Participating hosts (52 -> 49) ==
Additional (2): fi-byt-j1900 fi-gdg-551
Missing (5): fi-ctg-p8600 fi-ilk-m540 fi-byt-squawks fi-bsw-cyan fi-hsw-4200u
== Build changes ==
* IGT: IGT_4632 -> IGTPW_1803
CI_DRM_4782: 60edf94611d2374821fbe2a824cebcb425ce7b0d @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGTPW_1803: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_1803/
IGT_4632: 94b4e204473a7d9f49e536c8877a4a5636e0d1b2 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_1803/issues.html
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for tests/gem_ctx_isoation: Remove dead code
2018-09-06 16:51 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/gem_ctx_isoation: Remove dead code Antonio Argenziano
2018-09-06 16:58 ` Chris Wilson
2018-09-06 17:15 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
@ 2018-09-07 14:02 ` Patchwork
2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2018-09-07 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Antonio Argenziano; +Cc: igt-dev
== Series Details ==
Series: tests/gem_ctx_isoation: Remove dead code
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/49287/
State : success
== Summary ==
= CI Bug Log - changes from IGT_4632_full -> IGTPW_1803_full =
== Summary - WARNING ==
Minor unknown changes coming with IGTPW_1803_full need to be verified
manually.
If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in IGTPW_1803_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
External URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/49287/revisions/1/mbox/
== Possible new issues ==
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in IGTPW_1803_full:
=== IGT changes ===
==== Warnings ====
igt@perf_pmu@rc6:
shard-kbl: PASS -> SKIP
== Known issues ==
Here are the changes found in IGTPW_1803_full that come from known issues:
=== IGT changes ===
==== Issues hit ====
igt@kms_available_modes_crc@available_mode_test_crc:
shard-snb: PASS -> FAIL (fdo#106641)
igt@kms_busy@extended-pageflip-hang-oldfb-render-c:
shard-snb: SKIP -> INCOMPLETE (fdo#105411)
igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-primscrn-spr-indfb-fullscreen:
shard-glk: PASS -> FAIL (fdo#103167)
igt@kms_rotation_crc@sprite-rotation-180:
shard-snb: PASS -> FAIL (fdo#103925)
igt@kms_sysfs_edid_timing:
shard-glk: NOTRUN -> WARN (fdo#100047)
==== Possible fixes ====
igt@kms_cursor_legacy@cursor-vs-flip-toggle:
shard-hsw: FAIL (fdo#103355) -> PASS +1
igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-primscrn-cur-indfb-draw-blt:
shard-snb: INCOMPLETE (fdo#105411) -> PASS
igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-2p-primscrn-spr-indfb-draw-mmap-cpu:
shard-glk: FAIL (fdo#103167) -> PASS
igt@kms_rotation_crc@primary-rotation-180:
shard-snb: FAIL (fdo#103925) -> PASS
igt@kms_setmode@basic:
shard-kbl: FAIL (fdo#99912) -> PASS
fdo#100047 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100047
fdo#103167 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103167
fdo#103355 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103355
fdo#103925 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103925
fdo#105411 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105411
fdo#106641 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106641
fdo#99912 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99912
== Participating hosts (5 -> 5) ==
No changes in participating hosts
== Build changes ==
* IGT: IGT_4632 -> IGTPW_1803
* Linux: CI_DRM_4775 -> CI_DRM_4782
CI_DRM_4775: 1a2bb6c061217718b972b3f4a74b96b61cf19d0c @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
CI_DRM_4782: 60edf94611d2374821fbe2a824cebcb425ce7b0d @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGTPW_1803: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_1803/
IGT_4632: 94b4e204473a7d9f49e536c8877a4a5636e0d1b2 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_1803/shards.html
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-09-10 11:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-09-06 16:51 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/gem_ctx_isoation: Remove dead code Antonio Argenziano
2018-09-06 16:58 ` Chris Wilson
2018-09-06 17:05 ` Antonio Argenziano
2018-09-06 17:19 ` Chris Wilson
2018-09-07 7:11 ` Petri Latvala
2018-09-10 11:51 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2018-09-06 17:15 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2018-09-07 14:02 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).