From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: "Yadav, Jyoti R" <jyoti.r.yadav@intel.com>
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, anusha.srivatsa@intel.com,
intel-gfx@lists.freedektop.org
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v1 4/6] [intel-gfx][intel-dev] tests/pm_dc : This patch adds test to validate DC6 on SKL. DC6 on SKL is achieved with RPM enabled and DPMS OFF sequence.
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 12:50:43 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181003095043.GA3126@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3c6b87b5-163f-9c5f-ad35-ae2d75bdb430@intel.com>
On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 10:07:27AM +0530, Yadav, Jyoti R wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > @@ -193,6 +206,14 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > > "DC6 State is not achieved\n");
> > > cleanup(&data);
> > > }
> > > + igt_subtest("DC6_state_on_gen9") {
> > This isn't GEN9 specific, so could be called dc6-dpms-off. I suppose you
> > also want a dc5-dpms-off test.
>
> AS on Gen9, (I am sure about SKL, not sure about other Gen9
> platforms), on SKL, DC6 is achieved with DPMS off. but on Gen 11, DC6
> is achieved with PSR.
It must be also achieved with DPMS off everywhere where DC6 is
available.
> That's why i named test like "Dc6_state_on_gen9" and
> "Dc6_state_on_gen11".
No need to have the platform name in the subtest name, let's just do the
tests everywhere where the corresponding DC counter is available and
skip it elsewhere.
> Also on Gen9, DC5 is mainly achieved with PSR, on DPMS off directly we
> can enter into DC6.
Still, it makes sense to have a separate test for DC5, so we have a
better clue what goes wrong in case of failures.
> So in case of DPMS off scenario, i was mainly checking Dc6 counter,
> instead of checking DC5 and Dc6 counters both.
I still think we should have the following subtests:
dc5-psr
dc6-psr
dc5-dpms-off
dc6-dpms-off
And run each of these where the counter is available, skip them
otherwise.
> >
> > > + dc5_dc6_counter_before_suspend = read_dc5_dc6_counter(data.devid);
> > > + dpms_off_on(&data);
> > > + dc5_dc6_counter_after_resume = read_dc5_dc6_counter(data.devid);
> > > + igt_require_f(dc5_dc6_counter_after_resume > dc5_dc6_counter_before_suspend,
> > > + "DC6 State is not achieved\n");
> > > + cleanup(&data);
> > > + }
> > > igt_fixture {
> > > psr_disable(data.debugfs_fd);
> > > close(data.debugfs_fd);
> > > --
> > > 2.7.4
> > >
>
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-03 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-26 15:59 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v1 0/6] Added new test file pm_dc.c Jyoti Yadav
2018-09-26 15:59 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v1 1/6] [intel-gfx] lib/igt_pm : Moves Dmc_loaded() function into library. Because it will be used by new test pm_dc.c which will validate Display C States Jyoti Yadav
2018-10-02 13:11 ` Imre Deak
2018-09-26 15:59 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v1 2/6] [intel-gfx] tests/pm_dc : Added new test to verify Display C States. Currently this test validate DC5 upon PSR entry for Icelake, Skylake and Broxton platform Jyoti Yadav
2018-10-02 13:25 ` Imre Deak
2018-10-03 23:59 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-10-04 0:13 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-10-03 10:24 ` Petri Latvala
2018-09-26 15:59 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v1 3/6] [intel-gfx] tests/pm_dc : Added test to validate DC6 state on Gen11 platform. On Gen11 Platform, DC6 is achieved with PSR entry Jyoti Yadav
2018-10-02 13:31 ` Imre Deak
2018-09-26 15:59 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v1 4/6] [intel-gfx][intel-dev] tests/pm_dc : This patch adds test to validate DC6 on SKL. DC6 on SKL is achieved with RPM enabled and DPMS OFF sequence Jyoti Yadav
2018-10-02 13:36 ` Imre Deak
2018-10-03 4:37 ` Yadav, Jyoti R
2018-10-03 9:50 ` Imre Deak [this message]
2018-10-04 0:15 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-09-26 15:59 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v1 5/6] [intel-gfx] lib/intel_reg : This patch adds Display C States related residency counters Jyoti Yadav
2018-09-26 15:59 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v1 6/6] [intel-gfx] tests/Makefile : Added new file tests/pm_dc.c for compilation Jyoti Yadav
2018-10-02 13:38 ` Imre Deak
2018-10-03 10:25 ` Petri Latvala
2018-09-26 16:50 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Added new test file pm_dc.c Patchwork
2018-09-26 22:22 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-10-04 0:22 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v1 0/6] " Dhinakaran Pandiyan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181003095043.GA3126@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com \
--to=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=anusha.srivatsa@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedektop.org \
--cc=jyoti.r.yadav@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).